ST. JOSEPH - For the fourth consecutive season, the St. Joseph-Ogden competitive dance team will take the state stage. The Spartans secured a return trip to the Illinois High School Association Competitive Dance State Finals after finishing fourth Saturday at the Champaign Central Sectional. St. Joseph-Ogden posted a score of 81.20, earning one of the Class 1A qualifying spots and advancing to Friday’s preliminary round at Grossinger MotorsArena in Bloomington. This year’s SJO squad is made up of 10 dancers, blending underclass talent with experienced upperclass leaders. Freshmen Ava Buhr, Jillian Davis, Darby Manion and Leah Stephenson make up nearly half of the roster, joined by sophomore Ava Gallo. Juniors Lilly Sollars, Hadley McDonald and Alivia Learned bring prior state-level experience, while seniors Gracyn Sjoken and Abby Getty round out the lineup. The Spartans’ qualification continues a steady presence at the state level. Last season, St. Joseph-Ogden advanced out of the St. Anthony Sectional with a fourth-place finish before placing 16th out of 30 teams in the state preliminary round, falling four spots short of qualifying for the championship round. Under IHSA format, the top 12 teams in each division advance to Saturday’s finals. Also advancing from the Champaign Sectional in Class 1A were the Unity Rockettes, who finished third with a score of 83.93. Morton claimed the sectional title with an 89.30, while Clinton placed second at 88.57. Eureka and Fieldcrest completed the top six qualifiers. In Class 2A competition, sectional host Champaign Central earned the final state berth by finishing sixth with an 80.83, edging Mascoutah for the last qualifying position. Washington won the Class 2A title, followed by Bradley-Bourbonnais, Triad, Dunlap and Ottawa Township. Preliminary competition for the IHSA Competitive Dance State Finals begins at 10:15 a.m. Friday in Bloomington. Admission is $17, with tickets available online through Ticketmaster. Live coverage of the event will also be available on the NFHS Network. Below is a look back at the SJO's performance at state dance in 2025.
SJO Dance Team earns fourth straight trip to IHSA state finals
ST. JOSEPH - For the fourth consecutive season, the St. Joseph-Ogden competitive dance team will take the state stage. The Spartans secured a return trip to the Illinois High School Association Competitive Dance State Finals after finishing fourth Saturday at the Champaign Central Sectional. St. Joseph-Ogden posted a score of 81.20, earning one of the Class 1A qualifying spots and advancing to Friday’s preliminary round at Grossinger MotorsArena in Bloomington. This year’s SJO squad is made up of 10 dancers, blending underclass talent with experienced upperclass leaders. Freshmen Ava Buhr, Jillian Davis, Darby Manion and Leah Stephenson make up nearly half of the roster, joined by sophomore Ava Gallo. Juniors Lilly Sollars, Hadley McDonald and Alivia Learned bring prior state-level experience, while seniors Gracyn Sjoken and Abby Getty round out the lineup. The Spartans’ qualification continues a steady presence at the state level. Last season, St. Joseph-Ogden advanced out of the St. Anthony Sectional with a fourth-place finish before placing 16th out of 30 teams in the state preliminary round, falling four spots short of qualifying for the championship round. Under IHSA format, the top 12 teams in each division advance to Saturday’s finals. Also advancing from the Champaign Sectional in Class 1A were the Unity Rockettes, who finished third with a score of 83.93. Morton claimed the sectional title with an 89.30, while Clinton placed second at 88.57. Eureka and Fieldcrest completed the top six qualifiers. In Class 2A competition, sectional host Champaign Central earned the final state berth by finishing sixth with an 80.83, edging Mascoutah for the last qualifying position. Washington won the Class 2A title, followed by Bradley-Bourbonnais, Triad, Dunlap and Ottawa Township. Preliminary competition for the IHSA Competitive Dance State Finals begins at 10:15 a.m. Friday in Bloomington. Admission is $17, with tickets available online through Ticketmaster. Live coverage of the event will also be available on the NFHS Network. Below is a look back at the SJO's performance at state dance in 2025.
Three area dance teams qualify for IHSA dance state finals
CHAMPAIGN - Despite the looming threat of a major winter weather event, the performances went on as planned Saturday, and three area dance programs earned their place on the state stage. St. Joseph-Ogden, Unity and host Champaign Central all advanced from the IHSA Competitive Dance Sectional to the state finals, which will be held Friday at Grossinger Motors Arena in Bloomington. Competing in Class 2A, Champaign Central secured the final qualifying position by finishing sixth among 15 teams. The Maroons scored an 80.83 to narrowly edge Mascoutah’s 79.60, continuing a strong start for a program that has now qualified for state competition in both of its first two seasons. Washington claimed the sectional title with a 92.15, followed by Bradley-Bourbonnais (90.03), Triad (89.70), Dunlap (83.23) and Ottawa Township (82.47). In the Class 1A competition, Unity and St. Joseph-Ogden both punched their tickets to state. The Unity Rockettes placed third with an 83.93, finishing just ahead of the Spartans, who took fourth with an 81.20. Morton won the sectional championship with an 89.30, while Clinton finished second at 88.57. Eureka and Fieldcrest rounded out the top six qualifiers.
For Unity, the advancement marks the program’s ninth trip to the state finals at Grossinger Motor Arena. St. Joseph-Ogden will make its eighth overall appearance and its fourth consecutive trip to the state preliminary round. Several other area teams also competed at the Champaign sectional. Mahomet-Seymour placed seventh with a 75.07, Villa Grove finished ninth at 73.25, Oakwood was 13th with a 67.97 and Rantoul placed 14th with a score of 67.70. Preliminary competition for the advancing teams begins at 10:15 a.m. Friday. Admission is $17, with tickets available online through Ticketmaster. Fans may also watch live coverage of the state finals on the NFHS Network
You, too, can live to be over 100 years old
StatePoint Media - Living to 100 may sound extraordinary, but research suggests it’s more achievable—and enjoyable—than many people think. Studies show the majority of centenarians rate their health as good, and large numbers of people in this age group are mobile, active and optimistic. According to the American Medical Association, adopting these seven habits can improve longevity and quality of life: 1. Eat healthy. Think of food as medicine. Choose nutritious, whole foods. Eat more fruits that are dark in color — blue, purple and red — to get the most nutrients, as well as fiber-rich vegetables, especially non-starchy vegetables such as broccoli, carrots and leafy greens. Incorporate whole grains, nuts, seeds, lean meats and fish. Drink more water, or as an alternative, flavored or sparkling water with no added sugar. Reduce your intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and unhealthy ultra-processed foods, especially those with added sodium and sugar. Drinking sugary beverages, even 100% fruit juices, is associated with a higher mortality risk, according to a study published in JAMA Network Open. Eat fewer processed meats, which tend to be high in fat and heavy on added salt and preservatives. Limit your intake of refined grains, such as breads, crackers, baked goods and white rice. Drink less alcohol. 2. Exercise. Adults should aim for at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity activity or 75 minutes of vigorous-intensity activity weekly. A recent study published in JAMA found that putting down the television remote and walking can improve healthy aging — highlighting the importance of small everyday habits. 3. Get enough sleep. Adequate sleep improves memory, reduces stress, improves mood, and primes the body’s natural defenses against disease. But sleep quality decreases with age. Improve your sleep quality by setting a regular bedtime and wake-up time, insulating your bedroom against noise, avoiding exercise within an hour of bedtime, maintaining a cool and dark bedroom, and limiting fluids within two hours of bedtime. Also avoid alcohol before bedtime and make your bedroom a tech-free zone as screen-time can impact your ability to fall asleep and stay asleep. 4. Live with purpose. A sense of purpose can lead to increased energy, motivation, emotional stability and resilience. Take time for self-reflection and try meditation or yoga. Prioritize your values and beliefs and put them into action toward a goal that’s meaningful to you and benefits others. 5. Stay positive. To bust stress, take a break from decisions, connect with others, pet your dog or cat, write a to-do list (stick to three items), take time to recharge, laugh, sing, curb clutter, set boundaries, perform mindfulness exercises, practice gratitude, and seek help from a professional when stress becomes overwhelming. 6. Stay connected. Research shows that having social connections is a significant predictor of longevity and better physical, cognitive and mental health, while social isolation and loneliness are significant predictors of premature death and poor health. Unfortunately, there is a nationwide loneliness epidemic that medical experts consider a major public health concern. Combat loneliness with social clubs and community groups, or by taking up a hobby, learning something new or volunteering. If you’re struggling with loneliness, reach out to a professional, your doctor, family member or friend. You can also call the 988 crisis helpline for support 7. Get screened. Schedule preventive care, tests and health screenings to help your doctor spot certain conditions before they become more serious. Your doctor can recommend needed tests based on your age, gender and health conditions — including colonoscopies, mammograms, gynecological and prostate exams, and vision screenings. Today, there are many at-home screening options available. Some are more effective than others, and all work best – and minimize stress around results – when taken in consultation with a doctor. For more resources on staying healthy, visit http://www.ama-assn.org. “Everyone strives to live longer, but the goal should be to live as healthy as possible for as long as we live,” says AMA CEO John Whyte, MD, MPH. “Simple steps today – eating well, staying active, sleeping enough, and seeing your doctor – can add quality years, or even decades, to your life.”
Viewpoint | How ICE raids on homes violates the constitutional rights
by John E. Jones III
Dickinson College
Okay, I’m going to read the Fourth Amendment – and then you’re going to explain it to us, please! Here goes:
Can you help us understand what that means?
Since the beginning of the republic, it has been uncontested that in order to invade someone’s home, you need to have a warrant that was considered, and signed off on, by a judicial officer. This mandate is right within the Fourth Amendment; it is a core protection.
In addition to that, through jurisprudence that has evolved since the adoption of the Fourth Amendment, it is settled law that it applies to everyone. That would include noncitizens as well.
What I see in this directive that ICE put out, apparently quite some time ago and somewhat secretly, is something that, to my mind, turns the Fourth Amendment on its head.
What does the Fourth Amendment aim to protect someone from?
In the context of the ICE search, it means that a person’s home, as they say, really is their castle. Historically, it was meant to remedy something that was true in England, where the colonists came from, which was that the king or those empowered by the king could invade people’s homes at will. The Fourth Amendment was meant to establish a sort of zone of privacy for people, so that their papers, their property, their persons would be safe from intrusion without cause.
So it’s essentially a protection against abuse of the government’s power.
That’s precisely what it is.
Has the accepted interpretation of the Fourth Amendment changed over the centuries?
It hasn’t. But Fourth Amendment law has evolved because the framers, for example, didn’t envision that there would be cellphones. They couldn’t understand or anticipate that there would be things like cellphones and electronic surveillance. All those modalities have come into the sphere of Fourth Amendment protection. The law has evolved in a way that actually has made Fourth Amendment protections greater and more wide-ranging, simply because of technology and other developments such as the use of automobiles and other means of transportation. So there are greater protected zones of privacy than just a person’s home.
ICE says it only needs an administrative warrant, not a judicial warrant, to enter a home and arrest someone. Can you briefly describe the difference and what it means in this situation?
It’s absolutely central to the question here. In this context, an administrative warrant is nothing more than the folks at ICE headquarters writing something up and directing their agents to go arrest somebody. That’s all. It’s a piece of paper that says ‘We want you arrested because we said so.’ At bottom that’s what an administrative warrant is, and of course it hasn’t been approved by a judge.
This authorized use of administrative warrants to circumvent the Fourth Amendment flies in the face of their limited use prior to the ICE directive.
A judicially approved warrant, on the other hand, has by definition been reviewed by a judge. In this case, it would be either a U.S. magistrate judge or U.S. district judge. That means that it would have to be supported by probable cause to enter someone’s residence to arrest them.
So the key distinction is that there’s a neutral arbiter. In this case, a federal judge who evaluates whether or not there’s sufficient cause to – as is stated clearly in the Fourth Amendment – be empowered to enter someone’s home. An administrative warrant has no such protection. It is not much more than a piece of paper generated in a self-serving way by ICE, free of review to substantiate what is stated in it.
Have there been other kinds of situations, historically, where the government has successfully proposed working around the Fourth Amendment?
There are a few, such as consent searches and exigent circumstances where someone is in danger or evidence is about to be destroyed. But generally it’s really the opposite and cases point to greater protections. For example, in the 1960s the Supreme Court had to confront warrantless wiretapping; it was very difficult for judges in that age who were not tech-savvy to apply the Fourth Amendment to this technology, and they struggled to find a remedy when there was no actual intrusion into a structure. In the end, the court found that intrusion was not necessary and that people’s expectation of privacy included their phone conversations. This of course has been extended to various other means of technology including GPS tracking and cellphone use generally.
What’s the direction this could go in at this point?
What I fear here – and I think ICE probably knows this – is that more often than not, a person who may not have legal standing to be in the country, notwithstanding the fact that there was a Fourth Amendment violation by ICE, may ultimately be out of luck. You could say that the arrest was illegal, and you go back to square one, but at the same time you’ve apprehended the person. So I’m struggling to figure out how you remedy this.![]()
John E. Jones III, President, Dickinson College. He is also affiliated with Keep Our Republic’s Article Three Coalition.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Viewpoint | Trump's costly deportation policy producing unwhelming results
A budget tells a story. It reveals priorities, exposes intentions, and signals how power will be used. The newly expanded budget for Immigration and Customs Enforcement tells a story that should alarm anyone who values fiscal integrity, constitutional limits, and democratic accountability. In fiscal year 2024, ICE operated on a budget of roughly 10 billion dollars. Under the 2025 “Big Beautiful Bill,” the agency retained that base while receiving an additional 75 billion dollars in multiyear enforcement funding, available over approximately four years. Even if those supplemental funds are spread evenly, ICE now commands effective spending power of about 29 billion dollars annually. This is not an incremental increase. It is a structural transformation. An agency once described as a targeted enforcement body now wields resources approaching those of a national security institution, with little explanation and even less oversight. The administration insists this surge in funding is about deportation. The observable outcomes suggest otherwise. According to the Department of Homeland Security, a forced deportation costs approximately 18,000 dollars per person. By contrast, self deportation through the CBP Home app, including airfare, processing, and a cash stipend, costs about 5,100 dollars.
Using limited and unaudited publicly available data, ICE appears to have conducted roughly 300,000 to 330,000 formal forced removals over the past twelve months. In the final Biden administration fiscal year, ICE conducted approximately 271,000 forced removals. Even using the highest current estimate of 330,000, the increase amounts to about 59,000 removals, or roughly 22 percent. Given the intensity of MAGA rhetoric and the extraordinary budgetary expansion directed at illegal immigration, one would expect a far greater increase in deportations during the first year of Trump’s return to office. That has not occurred. This disparity raises a fundamental question. Are taxpayers funding effective immigration enforcement, or underwriting a vastly expanded apparatus whose mission now extends far beyond its original purpose? When spending multiplies while outcomes stagnate, and budgets swell while transparency shrinks, skepticism is not partisan. It is prudent. What makes this moment especially troubling is how ICE now operates inside American cities. In Minneapolis and other urban centers, the agency has effectively occupied neighborhoods through sustained deployments, visible patrols, coordinated raids, and multiple deadly shootings. These actions resemble federal policing campaigns more than immigration enforcement. Streets are saturated with armed agents. Communities report a constant presence. The message is unmistakable. This is not about processing cases. It is about asserting control. Alongside this urban expansion has come a collapse of constitutional safeguards. Masked agents conduct operations without visible identification. Homes are entered without warrants. Traffic stops occur without clear cause or authority. United States citizens are detained and required to prove their citizenship. Detainees report harsh and degrading treatment. To date, there is no public record of ICE officers being meaningfully disciplined for these actions. Authority expands. Accountability disappears. Due process erodes. These are not isolated incidents. They reflect an institutional posture increasingly untethered from the rule of law. When agents conceal their identities, bypass judicial oversight, and face no consequences, the result is not enforcement but intimidation. The Constitution does not yield to expediency. Rights do not evaporate because an agency is well funded.
The human cost is substantial. Raids executed with overwhelming force to apprehend nonviolent individuals traumatize families and destabilize neighborhoods. Faulty intelligence leads to mistaken targets, emotional harm, and property damage that is rarely reimbursed. Children watch parents taken away. Citizens discover that documentation offers no protection when an unaccountable force decides otherwise. Fear becomes routine. Trust becomes impossible. The budget surge demands a more candid interpretation. A force that is lavishly funded, lightly supervised, and aggressively deployed within cities begins to resemble a national police force rather than an immigration service. It arrests without warrants, detains without explanation, and occupies neighborhoods without consent. It answers upward to executive authority, not outward to the public. Three questions deserve direct answers. What problem justified a nearly threefold increase in annual spending power? Why do expenditures so dramatically exceed measurable outcomes? Who benefits from an enforcement body that grows more powerful as it grows less accountable? Democracies rarely fail all at once. They erode through normalized excess, tolerated abuse, and unchecked authority. When budgets explode, rights contract, and accountability vanishes, the warning signs are unmistakable. Eighty five billion dollars and no answers is not merely a budgeting problem. It is a governance crisis.
About the author ~
More Editorial Viewpoints
Grind Session all-star shootout brings elite prep basketball teams to Champaign
CHAMPAIGN - Champaign will become a focal point of the national high school basketball scene next weekend, starting on Friday, January 30, as the Grind Session brings its three-day all-star shootout showcase to Parkland College. Scheduled for Friday through Sunday, the event draws some of the country’s most elite prep programs and prospects to Champaign, placing local fans within arm’s reach of future college stars and NBA talent. The Grind Session circuit has produced more than 3,000 players who advanced to collegiate or professional careers, including roughly 100 NBA players and more than 20 first-round draft picks. Among its alumni are NBA champions Jamal Murray, Jayson Tatum and Shai Gilgeous-Alexander. Headlining the showcase is national powerhouse Prolific Prep, ranked No. 3 in the country by ESPN. The Florida-based program features five-star seniors Caleb Holt and Bruce Branch III, both projected as potential lottery picks in the 2027 NBA Draft, along with Nasir Anderson, widely regarded as the top point guard in the Class of 2027. Prolific Prep is one of nine teams from five states and Canada set to compete in Champaign, creating a weekend slate packed with marquee matchups. Games begin Friday afternoon and continue through Sunday, with contests featuring programs from Illinois, Florida, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Tennessee and Ontario. “We’re incredibly excited to bring the Grind Session to Champaign,” Grind Session co-founder and CEO Scott Waldrop said. “This community is going to experience the Grind Session at its best—elite competition, high-level coaching, and some of the top high school players in the country all under one roof.” Admission is $15 per day, with free entry for children 6 and under. The showcase offers fans, coaches and scouts a rare opportunity to see the next generation of basketball talent up close, without leaving central Illinois.
Grind Session schedule
FRIDAY, JANUARY 303:00 p.m. – Chi Prep (IL) vs. Minnesota Prep (MN)
4:45 p.m. – Academy of Central Florida (FL) vs. West Oaks (FL)
6:30 p.m. – Prolific Prep (FL) vs. DME Wisconsin (WI)
8:15 p.m. – Hamilton heights (TN) vs. Fort Erie International (ON, CAN)
SATURDAY, JANUARY 31
10:30 a.m. – Minnesota Prep (MN) vs. Southeastern Prep 2 (FL)
4:45 p.m. – Fort Erie International (ON, CAN) vs. Prolific Prep (FL)
6:30 p.m. – West Oaks (FL) vs. Hamilton Heights (TN)
8:15 p.m. – DME Wisconsin (WI) vs. Academy of Central Florida (FL)
SUNDAY, FEBRUARY 1
11:00 a.m. – Southeastern Prep 2 (FL) vs. Chi Prep (IL)
More basketball stories
Viewpoint | October 7
by Yumna Zahid Ali, Guest Commentator
The war did not begin on October 7, 2023, no matter how loudly that date is repeated to erase the long history of occupation and conflict that came before it. October 7 is used as a license to forget, a convenient starting line that allows seventy-five years of dispossession, occupation, siege, and repeated military assaults to be reduced to historical ash. But the testimonies of the oppressed do not work that way.
In 1967, Israel occupied the Gaza Strip following the Six-Day War, placing its population under military rule and control. From that moment forward, Gaza’s residents did not control their borders, their airspace, or their freedom of movement. Daily life was regulated by an occupying power that could decide who traveled, who entered, who passed through a checkpoint, who received medicine, and who would have their name crossed out. This was not a temporary emergency measure; it was the normalization of domination, and it hardened a sense of injustice, not because Palestinians rejected peace, but because they were never offered freedom. By 1987, that pressure escalated into the First Intifada, a mass uprising driven largely by civilians who used protests, strikes, and civil disobedience to confront decades of occupation. It was not an armed invasion but a civilian-led revolt born from humiliation and dehumanization, and it was met with ferocious military force, mass arrests, beatings, and live ammunition. This was the state screaming its only truth: “We have the guns. Your justice is a fantasy. Obey.” The 1990s brought the Oslo Accords, which were sold to the world as a peace process but felt to many Palestinians like an agreement to keep talking about…an agreement that would never come. While a Palestinian Authority was created, real sovereignty never followed, and Israel retained decisive control over borders, armed enforcement, and colonization. Settlement expansion continued in the West Bank, occupation remained intact, and Gaza was targeted for further degradation. What was presented as a diplomatic solution over time revealed itself as management of the conflict rather than its resolution, breeding disillusionment instead of reconciliation. In 2005, Israel announced its unilateral “disengagement” from Gaza, withdrawing settlers and soldiers from inside the strip while keeping its chokehold over its airspace, territorial waters, population registry, and all land crossings. Gaza was not freed; it was sealed. Its people could not move, trade, or rebuild freely, and the territory became dependent on an occupying power that claimed it was no longer responsible while still maintaining a remote-controlled siege. This contradiction was the catalyst for what followed.
When Hamas won Palestinian elections in 2006, Gaza was placed under a strangling blockade by Israel, with Egypt’s cooperation and Western backing. This was not a counter-terrorism operation; it was collective punishment imposed on over two million people, most of them civilians, many of them children still in diapers. The blockade crippled Gaza’s economy, restricted food, medicine, fuel, and construction materials, and trapped every last soul in a sealed enclosure. Despair deepened, and the world largely accepted it as necessary. What followed were repeated military assaults that reinforced the reality of Gaza as a place where civilian life was expendable. In 2008–2009, Operation Cast Lead killed around 1,400 Palestinians, including hundreds of children, while Israel lost 13 people, several from friendly fire. In 2012, Operation Pillar of Defense left 167 Palestinians dead in just eight days. In 2014, Operation Protective Edge devastated Gaza over 51 days, killing more than 2,200 Palestinians, over 500 of them children, and flattening densely populated city quarters while Gaza remained shrink-wrapped and unable to shelter its people. Each assault cycled back to the same four words: ceasefire, rubble, blockade, trauma. In 2018, Palestinians attempted a different form of resistance through the Great March of Return, where largely unarmed protesters demanded an end to the blockade and the restitution of their right of return to the homes dispossessed in 1948. They were quelled with sniper fire. Over 200 were killed, thousands were wounded, many were permanently disabled, and dozens of children were brutalized by bullets. Even the protest was treated as a threat to be eliminated rather than an appeal for humanity to be heeded. The punitive pattern continued through May 2021 and August 2022, with further Israeli operations killing hundreds more Palestinians, including many children, while Gaza remained stranded, impoverished, and futureless. This was not an accidental escalation. It was a one-sided, deeply imbalanced war. One side owns the prison and writes the news. The other digs graves and waits to be bombed again. To claim that the war began on October 7, 2023, is not an act of providing a complete picture; it is an act of distortion and falsification. It erases the refugee camps, the occupation, the blockade, the bombings, the crushed protests, and a childhood defined by sirens. It reframes history so that violence appears spontaneous rather than inevitable, detached rather than provoked. October 7 represents a critical node in a continuous historical sequence…one that begins not in 2023, but in 1948, with the foundational injustices that have defined the conflict ever since. “You cannot bury seventy-five years of suffering under one date and then call it honesty.”
About the author ~
More Editorial Viewpoints
Area prep basketball scores and recaps from Friday
Boys Basketball
Unity tops Prairie Central on the road
Improving to 18-2, the Rockets used another fourth-quarter outburst to down another opponent. Down 41-37, Tyler Henry led a fourth-quarter rally with eight points to finish with a game-high 17. Tre Hoggard, who converted seven times on his eight trips to the free throw line, supplied 14 pointsBoys' Area Scoreboard
St. Joseph-Ogden 55, Monticello 45
Unity 59, Prairie Central 48
Arthur-Lovington-Atwood-Hammond 67, Heritage 60
Champaign Central 57, Salem 53
Rantoul vs St. Thomas More - no score reported
MacArthur 72, Mahomet-Seymour 36
Girls Basketball
Girls' Area Scoreboard
Champaign Central 58, Mt. Zion 49
Centennial 64, Urbana 46
More basketball stories
Photo of the Day | The eye for pie
Past Photos of the Day
Taking on one of personal care's least-talked-about problems
Chicago-based Cheek Sheets is looking to change that.
Cheek Sheets today announced the launch of its namesake absorbent sheets, an ultra-thin, dry and discreet personal-care product designed to help absorb sweat and manage unwanted moisture between the cheeks before it becomes uncomfortable, embarrassing or funky.