When a president is unfit for office, here’s what the Constitution says can happen



by Kirsten Matoy Carlson
   Wayne State University
   The Conversation




Bipartisan calls for President Donald Trump’s removal from office increased on April 7, 2026, after he issued threats to destroy “a whole civilization” if Iran refuses to reopen the Strait of Hormuz.

These calls have come from across the political spectrum, from Democratic Reps. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York and Melanie Stansbury of New Mexico to former Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene and right-wing pundit Alex Jones. Unlikely allies seem to agree that the president has gone too far and needs to be reined in.

Their concerns have emerged as Iran has walked away from talks to end the war and Trump’s language suggests that he plans to escalate it by destroying the country’s power plants and bridges.

Concerns over Trump’s fitness for office have grown in recent weeks as his commentary has become more erratic.

If lawmakers do attempt to remove Trump from office, here’s what would happen:

25th Amendment

The Constitution’s 25th Amendment provides a way for high-level officials to remove a president from office. It was ratified in 1967 in the wake of the 1963 assassination of John F. Kennedy – who was succeeded by Lyndon Johnson, who had already had one heart attack – as well as delayed disclosure of health problems experienced by Kennedy’s predecessor, Dwight Eisenhower.

The 25th Amendment provides detailed procedures on what happens if a president resigns, dies in office, has a temporary disability or is no longer fit for office.

It has never been invoked against a president’s will, and has been used only to temporarily transfer power, such as when a president is undergoing a medical procedure requiring anesthesia.

Section 4 of the 25th Amendment authorizes high-level officials – either the vice president and a majority of the Cabinet or another body designated by Congress – to remove a president from office without his consent when he is “unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office.” Congress has yet to designate an alternative body, and scholars disagree over the role, if any, of acting Cabinet officials.

The high-level officials simply send a written declaration to the president pro tempore of the Senate – the longest-serving senator from the majority party – and the speaker of the House of Representatives, stating that the president is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office. The vice president immediately assumes the powers and duties of the president.

The president, however, can fight back. He or she can seek to resume their powers by informing congressional leadership in writing that they are fit for office and no disability exists. But the president doesn’t get the presidency back just by saying this.

The high-level officials originally questioning the president’s fitness then have four days to decide whether they disagree with the president. If they notify congressional leadership that they disagree, the vice president retains control and Congress has 48 hours to convene to discuss the issue. Congress has 21 days to debate and vote on whether the president is unfit or unable to resume his powers.

The vice president remains the acting president until Congress votes or the 21-day period lapses. A two-thirds majority vote by members of both houses of Congress is required to remove the president from office. If that vote fails or does not happen within the 21-day period, the president resumes his powers immediately.

The case for impeachment

Article II of the Constitution authorizes Congress to impeach and remove the president – and other federal officials – from office for “Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” The founders included this provision as a tool to punish a president for misconduct and abuses of power. It’s one of the many ways that Congress could keep the president in check, if it chose to.

Impeachment proceedings begin in the House of Representatives. A member of the House files a resolution for impeachment. The resolution goes to the House Judiciary Committee, which usually holds a hearing to evaluate the resolution. If the House Judiciary Committee thinks impeachment is proper, its members draft and vote on articles of impeachment. Once the House Judiciary Committee approves articles of impeachment, they go to the full House for a vote.

If the House of Representatives impeaches a president or another official, the action then moves to the Senate. Under the Constitution’s Article I, the Senate has the responsibility for determining whether to remove the person from office. Normally, the Senate holds a trial, but it controls its procedures and can limit the process if it wants.

Ultimately, the Senate votes on whether to remove the president – which requires a two-thirds majority, or 67 senators. To date, the Senate has never voted to remove a president from office, although it almost did in 1868, when President Andrew Johnson escaped removal from office by one vote.

The Senate also has the power to disqualify a public official from holding public office in the future. If the person is convicted and removed from office, only then can senators vote on whether to permanently disqualify that person from ever again holding federal office. Members of Congress proposing the impeachment of Trump have promised to include a provision to do so. A simple majority vote is all that’s required then.


This is an updated version of an article originally published on Jan. 9, 2021.

Kirsten Matoy Carlson, Professor of Law and Adjunct Professor of Political Science, Wayne State University

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


Letter to the Editor |
Reader fears Midterm elections may be compromised


Here are the steps Republicans will use to stain and subvert the upcoming elections.


Dear Editor,

Will the 2026 Midterm elections be conducted in a “free and fair” manner? Could they be compromised in some fashion? Yes, but how?

Step One: Mr. Trump will declare, without verifiable evidence, that voter fraud will take place during said elections in Blue states. He signs an Executive Order limiting mail-in voting.

Step Two: Legislators in some Red states will promulgate creative laws to allow the “redrawing” of congressional district maps, to “gain” additional U.S. House of Representatives seats.

Step Three: Given unverified voter fraud allegations, the Department of Justice will instruct the FBI to initiate criminal/civil court proceedings against Blue states suspected of perpetrating such fraud.

Step Four: Again, based upon voter fraud allegations, the Department of Homeland Security will deploy ICE agents to large cities in Blue states to monitor, patrol, question, and detain registered voters “deemed suspicious.”

Step Five: Republican members of Congress will be instructed to promulgate new laws and statues designed to prevent full participation by all citizens eligible to vote, by introducing VOTER ID requirements, eliminating mail-in ballots, etc..

Step Six: Both the Director of National Intelligence and the Director of the CIA will declare evidence of foreign government interference with voting machines in Blue states and will impound said machines until a thorough investigation has been conducted. The election results will, therefore, be postponed until further notice.

Mr. Trump has installed loyal sycophants in all of the agencies cited above, who are more than willing to subvert “free and fair” elections taking place especially in Blue states.

WARNING, free and fair Midterm elections may not take place in 2026.


John M. Mishler
Harpswell, ME


About the author ~

John M. Mishler was a former Associate Vice Chancellor for Research and Professor of Basic Life Sciences, Medicine, and Pharmacology at the University of Missouri. He currently resides in Harpswell, Maine.


TAGS:

Communities divided over AI Data Centers in Illinois, lawmakers eye regulations


A proposed $500 million data center in Sangamon County is drawing mixed reactions from residents and officials. Supporters point to economic growth, job creation and investment. Critics raise concerns about environmental impact, water use and rising energy costs.


I must say, the more I learn about them, the more concerned I am...


by Judith Ruiz-Branch
Public News Service


CHICAGO - Rural Illinois is another area where tech companies are looking to build massive artificial-intelligence data centers. Communities are split on whether they should welcome them.

A proposed $500 million data center by CyrusOne in Sangamon County that would utilize about 280 acres of farmland has sparked debate among residents, officials and lawmakers. Supporters highlight economic benefits such as construction jobs, permanent employment and local investment. Critics counter that there would be a limited number of local jobs, and also raise concern about environmental impacts, rising electricity costs and water usage.

Local activist Lori McKiernan with the Coalition for Springfield’s Utility Future called for more scrutiny.

"I’m not against data centers, but I must say, the more I learn about them, the more concerned I am," she said. "And I want our county board to do their due diligence to address all of these concerns and make sure they’re not impacting their constituents."

The Sangamon County Board voted to postpone a final vote on the proposed project after hours of public opposition. The decision delays the approval of what would be the county’s first major data center.

Meanwhile, Illinois lawmakers are considering new regulations, including the Power Act, which would require data centers to use clean energy, cover infrastructure costs, and disclose water and environmental impacts.

Scott Allen, a policy analyst for the Citizens Utility Board, said this comes amid broader concern that large data centers could shift utility costs onto residents.

"This legislative session that’s currently underway is going to be the data center legislative session," he said. "Especially at the legislative level, we’re not going to get anything done until this data center thing is figured out."

Sangamon County is just the latest community in Illinois to put a pause on data center projects. Neighboring towns and cities have passed moratoriums on data center applications and have turned projects down.




TAGS: Sangamon County data center proposal Illinois debate, AI data centers rural Illinois environmental concerns, Illinois Power Act data center regulations explained, impact of data centers on electricity costs Illinois, community response to data center projects Illinois

Viewpoint |
The costs of the Iran Conflict are rising, accountability is not


One month into a war the White House says is going well, this Viewpoint from Van Abbott argues the opposite — that the U.S.-Iran conflict is quietly eroding American economic strength, weakening global alliances, and repeating the strategic mistakes of Iraq and Afghanistan.


oursentinel.com viewpoint
by Van Abbott
Guest Commentator


The war is not won. It is not even close.

President Trump says otherwise. That claim is not a mistake. It is a necessity. Acknowledging failure would expose the truth this administration cannot afford to admit: one month into the conflict that began February 28 with Iran, the United States is poorer, weaker, and less secure than when it began.

The costs are already staggering. Tens of billions of dollars have been consumed with little to show beyond destruction. Fuel prices have surged, driving up transportation costs across the economy. Supply disruptions from the Gulf are beginning to ripple through American manufacturing. These are not abstract figures. They are the early signs of a war that is eroding economic strength at home while delivering no measurable gain abroad.


A declaration of victory is required to sustain support, even when conditions on the ground contradict it.

Strategically, the damage is deeper. American positions across the Middle East have contracted, not expanded. Analysts suggest U.S. military bases have been damaged, evacuated, or destroyed. Intelligence relationships have frayed as allies question Washington’s reliability after erratic decisions and unilateral strikes. Adversaries are not retreating; they are adapting. Russia benefits from higher energy prices that help finance its war in Ukraine. China is moving quickly to secure alternative trade routes and deepen its regional influence. While the White House speaks of dominance, the global balance of power is quietly shifting away from the United States.

At home, the consequences will not remain distant for long. War-inflation moves quickly and unevenly. Energy costs rise first, followed by food and housing. Wages lag behind. The administration describes these effects as temporary, but markets tend to recognize instability before governments admit it. Prolonged conflict will bring neither stability in the Middle East nor relief for American households. It will deliver sustained pressure on both.

History offers a warning the country has ignored before. Iraq was presented as liberation and ended in strategic exhaustion. Afghanistan became a twenty-year effort that concluded with the return of the very forces it sought to remove. These were failures not of courage or capability, but of purpose and judgment. Iran now risks becoming the next chapter in a pattern the United States has yet to break.

The deeper problem is political. This war cannot be easily concluded because it cannot be honestly assessed. A declaration of victory is required to sustain support, even when conditions on the ground contradict it. Information narrows. Public updates diminish. Official statements grow more confident as underlying realities become less certain. In that environment, the war becomes less a national undertaking than a controlled narrative.

It is worth asking who benefits from that narrative. Defense contractors secure long-term demand, energy producers profit from volatility, and political allies avoid difficult votes. The burdens fall elsewhere, on service members, on taxpayers, and on households adjusting to rising costs. The longer the conflict continues, the wider the gap grows between those who bear its costs and those who shape its direction.


War tests more than military strength. It tests whether a government can tell the truth about what it is doing and why.

President Trump once promised to end “endless wars.” Instead, this conflict risks becoming one. It is sustained not by clear objectives but by the political cost of reversal. A war without defined success can always be extended. A war without accountability can always be justified.

There is still time to limit the damage. Congress retains the constitutional authority to define and constrain the use of force. It can require transparency, set boundaries, and insist on measurable objectives. A free press can challenge official claims rather than repeat them. Citizens can demand clarity about costs, risks, and outcomes before accepting assurances of progress.

War tests more than military strength. It tests whether a government can tell the truth about what it is doing and why. When that capacity erodes, the outcome is determined long before the fighting ends.

Without accountability, the cycle will continue, draining national strength, distorting priorities, weakening alliances, and turning permanent conflict into a substitute for strategy and democratic consent.

This war was never winnable under the terms on which it was sold. That truth will not come from those who began it, but from the public that is paying for it and will continue to bear its cost.

Its consequences will outlast the last shot, echo beyond the last speech, and endure long after the final excuse has faded. The judgment they refuse to render will fall to the country they have led into war. Vote in November.


About the author ~
Van Abbott is a long time resident of Alaska and California. He has held financial management positions in government and private organizations in California, Kansas, and Alaska. He is retired and writes Op-Eds as a hobby. He served in the Peace Corps in the late sixties. You can find more of his commentaries and comments on life in America on Substack.





What do you think?
Whether you agree, disagree, or want to build on the ideas in this piece, we’d love to hear your voice. If you have an opinion you’d like to share — on this topic or any other — you can find our submission guidelines here: Sentinel submission guideline.

We welcome a wide range of viewpoints and would be glad to consider your perspective for publication on OurSentinel.com. . Send your letter or commentary to editor@oursentinel.com and help keep the community conversation moving forward.


Viewpoint |
Has Trump gone too far? Respond at the ballot box if you think so


oursentinel.com viewpoint
This commentary questions whether Donald Trump has exceeded acceptable limits through a series of political and policy decisions. It outlines concerns ranging from pardons and foreign policy to economic impacts and domestic governance. The piece argues that many Americans are now feeling the effects of these actions.


oursentinel.com viewpoint
by John Mishler


Mr. Trump pardoned hundreds of individuals convicted of attempting to subvert a lawful and secure national election by a violent assault on law enforcement officers. Did he go too far? In addition, he pardoned several individuals convicted of cryptocurrency manipulation. Gone too far? He and his family have received hundreds of millions of dollars with their blatant cryto-related business ventures. Has he gone too far? He has received a 747 jetliner as a gift. Gone too far?

He has encouraged the unlawful removal of thousands of federal employees targeted by Elon Musk/DOGE. Gone too far? He has politicized various government departments (e.g., Department of Justice, Department of Defense, etc.) and demanded they follow his whims and desires, rather than uphold state, federal, and international laws. Has he gone too far? With his own hateful rhetoric he has encouraged ICE to brutalize innocent citizens and lawful immigrants, even allowing the murder of said American citizens, in addition to the deaths of immigrants held in federal detention centers. Gone too far?

He has torn down the East Wing of the White House, without proper approvals, to be replaced by a hideous, gigantic ballroom. Has he gone too far? He has “added” his name to the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts. Gone too far?

He has allowed two totally unqualified individuals (two real estate brokers) to negotiate extremely important treaties with Russia/Ukraine, Iran, and Gaza/Israel. Has he gone too far? He has disrupted important relationships the United States has with NATO and the European Union. Gone too far?


His “Big, Beautiful Bill,” has eliminated healthcare subsidies for millions of hardworking Americans

He has “pressured” law firms, colleges and universities, and media companies to “follow” his desire and eliminate DEI policies. Gone too far? He has instructed the Department of Justice to put forth criminal/civil charges against innocent political opponents without evidence of unlawful conduct. Has he gone too far?

His name has appeared in numerous documents related to the Epstein files, including an alleged incident of sexual assault against a minor. Has he gone too far? In addition, he is hindering the full and complete release of all documents, files, videos, photographs, and other pertinent materials related to the Epstein investigation. Gone too far?

Trump has “added on" additional taxes on imported goods, paid for by US citizens, by virtue of his imposed tariffs placed on products from foreign countries. Gone too far? His “Big, Beautiful Bill,” has eliminated healthcare subsidies for millions of hardworking Americans, as well as SNAP benefits. Gone too far?

Trump’s “unnecessary” war with Iran has resulted in the loss of lives of US service members, caused chaos in the Middle East, and significantly raised the price of gasoline, heating oil, natural gas, fertilizer, and other petroleum-based products. Has he finally gone too far? Did he reach the tipping point…. yes. BUT why? For most Americans, all of the “misadventures” listed above, happened to other individuals/organizations and did not significantly/directly impact their own lives. However, as a result of his unjustified conflict/excursion/war, petroleum products NOW suddenly cost more and are rising on a daily basis - NOW, on a personal level, most Americans feel the “pain" of Mr. Trump’s foolish behavior.

Ergo, too many Americans have been “asleep” during the initial stages of Mr. Trump’s second term. BUT, now suddenly “personally feeling” the pain of higher prices at the gas pumps, soon to be followed by higher prices for most goods relying on gasoline/petroleum products, we have begun to notice how “tainted” Trump’s tenure as president has been.

Is there a remedy for his unrelenting toxic actions? Yes, the upcoming midterm elections, where Americans can elect candidates who care more about their constituents, than following the whims of Mr. Trump and his sycophants (“This year’s political candidates: carefully examine their party affiliation,” Storm Lake Times Pilot, 02/06/2026).

So, we can reclaim our Democracy in the coming election, BUT only if we support worthwhile candidates BY VOTING! Maybe a new cohort of honest and law-abiding US Senate and House members can thwart any further “how far is too far” misadventures by Mr. Trump.


About the author ~

John M. Mishler was a former Associate Vice Chancellor for Research and Professor of Basic Life Sciences, Medicine, and Pharmacology at the University of Missouri. He currently resides in Harpswell, Maine.




TAGS: Donald Trump political commentary 2026, opinion on Trump policies and midterm elections, analysis of Trump economic and foreign policy impact, voter response to political controversies United States, midterm elections importance voter participation opinion

Photo gallery |
Urbana joined more than 3,200 US locations in No Kings III protest


Protesters march down Main Street in Urbana for No Kings 3
All photos: Sentinel/Clark Brooks

Marchers walk down Main Street in Urbana during Saturday's No Kings 3 march. More than 3,200 demonstrations were planned around the country and on several continents, as protesters took to the streets in a show of outrage over Trump administration's handling of the war with Iran, immigration policies, and the rising cost of gas and food. While the crowd size appeared smaller than last October protest, no official estimates on the turn out has been released.

LEFT: With the temperature reaching the lower 50s, the rally and march attracted hundreds to downtown Urbana on Saturday. MIDDLE: Protestors lined Vine Street solicitating honks and cheers from drivers who passed by. RIGHT: A protester hoists a sign that says, "We the People are PISSED" as she walks down Main St. in Urbana. A recent national NBC News poll found that a majority of voters are not happy with the president’s handling of immigration, Iran and inflation and the cost of living.

Marchers turn at the corner of Race and Vine in Urbana, marching in the No Kings III protest

Above: Demonstrators turn at the corner of Race and Main Street near the end of the protest route. Below: Proudly sporting his red cap, a Trump supporter and his spouse engage in a civil discussion with a protester about the President's current policies.
All photos: Sentinel/Clark Brooks

LEFT: Demonstrators take a moment to rest midway through the rally. Protest signs were more imaginative than those present at the first NO KINGS protests. MIDDLE: Marchers leading the procession walk past the Urbana library. "Protesting is a powerful tool in the fight against the fascist regime “leading” our country," Champaign County Indivisible wrote on a Facebook post. RIGHT: Marchers head back to Courthouse Plaza or the corner of Vine and Main to continue protesting.

Protesters stroll north on Race St. in Urbana chanting anti-Trump slogans. Organizers of the nation-wide protest expected millions to gather around the country in what could be the “single largest non-violent day of action” in American history.





Advisory vote tests support for federal school choice program in Illinois


Illinois voters are considering a March 17 advisory referendum on a federal school choice tax credit program. The initiative could provide scholarships of up to $1,700 for eligible students.

Student doing homework

Photo: Annie Spratt/Unsplash

Supporters of the federal school choice tax credit program says it expands educational access across private, public and homeschool settings. Opponents warn it may disproportionately benefit wealthier families while straining public school resources.


by Judith Ruiz-Branch
Public News Service


CHICAGO - Millions of Illinois voters are weighing in March 17 on whether the state should opt in to the federal school choice tax credit initiative.

Supporters are hoping poll results show statewide support for the tax credit scholarship program, which could benefit private, public and homeschooled students in Illinois with scholarships of up to $1,700.

Dick Simpson, professor emeritus of political science at the University of Illinois-Chicago and a former Chicago alderman, called it a political pressure campaign meant to influence Governor JB Pritzker. He suggested overwhelming support could potentially sway him but noted a critical limitation.

"Because it's not being held in the most important Democratic areas of the state, and it's primarily in counties that are Republican, that has less power," Simpson pointed out.

The advisory question will appear on ballots in more than 30 Illinois counties. It will be included in only some communities throughout Cook, Lake and Winnebago counties. States must choose to opt in by Jan. 1, 2027.

Opponents of the program said it would divert funds from public education and disproportionately benefit the wealthy. Simpson stressed any increase in funding for education is good. However, he noted establishing a dichotomy between supporting students in private education versus supporting better public education is a cause for tension. He said ultimately, today’s vote will be based on the priorities of voters.

"I think they have to weigh: Do they support scholarships for all students coming from federal funds, or do they prefer to support public education, which is under threat and needs more students in the system and more money in the system," Simpson explained.

Simpson added using referendums to show public support or opposition for an issue is a useful tool for citizens to communicate their opinions to public officials. However, recently proposed legislation would prohibit Illinois from adopting the program.




TAGS: Illinois school choice referendum March 17, federal tax credit scholarship Illinois vote, Illinois education funding debate 2026, JB Pritzker school choice policy Illinois, Illinois ballot question school scholarships

Letter to the Editor |
Bigotry undermines the principles of our nation


Sentinel logo
President Trump claimed these violent felons did not attack anyone after issuing a blanket pardon to Daniel Rodriguez and others after the attack of Michael Fanone.


Dear Editor,

Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) recently posted on social media that “Muslims don’t belong in American society.”

Similarly, in February, Rep. Randy Fine (R-FL) wrote on X: "If they force us to choose, the choice between dogs and Muslims is not a difficult one."

House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) has declined to condemn these comments, asserting, “I’ve spoken to those members and all members, as I always do, about our tone and our message and what we say.”

Anti-Muslim racism receives little pushback in our country. Imagine the furor if the word "Jews" was substituted for "Muslims" in these statements.

Bigotry against any faith community undermines the principles our nation claims to uphold. History shows where such dehumanization leads. Both citizens and elected leaders must insist that dignity and equality belong to all Americans, without exception.


Terry Hansen
Grafton, WI

Terry Hansen is a retired educator from Grafton, WI, who writes frequently about climate change and on human rights. He lives in Grafton, WIsconsin.



TAGS: Muslim hate is growing in America, American politicians push xenophobia against Muslims, religious freedom is prohibited in the United States, Muslim bigotry goes against the ideas that built this country

A senseless war: Trump lights a fuse that will burn uncontrolled


oursentinel.com viewpoint
Trump’s phrase, “some people will die,” reduces everything to numbers. To him, the people who will suffer in the turmoil to come are faceless pawns.


oursentinel.com viewpoint
by Van Abbott


When a president shrugs at the prospect of death, it reveals more than his intentions. “Some people will die,” Donald Trump said almost offhand as his administration committed the nation to war with Iran. Those four words captured the moral emptiness at the heart of this conflict and the cold calculation behind it.

This war is unjust, unprovoked, and unwinnable. It has been sold to the public with muddled rhetoric about deterrence, freedom, and national pride. Yet every justification collapses under scrutiny. The administration cannot even agree on the purpose of the war. The reasoning changes from week to week, as if constant repetition might transform confusion into strategy. The truth is painful but plain: there is no strategy at all.

By ordering the killing of Iran’s supreme leader and much of his senior circle, Trump lit a fuse that cannot be controlled. Iran is a nation that transforms grievance into duty. It remembers its martyrs, teaches their stories, and defines identity through vengeance. Anyone who imagines such a strike will be forgotten misunderstands both the politics and the faith that drive Iran’s resolve.


The concern is not a single transaction but a recurring structure in which public authority and private enterprise operate without durable separation.

History already offers warnings. In 1989, Ayatollah Khomeini issued a fatwa (religious decree), calling for the death of writer Salman Rushdie, whose novel The Satanic Verses was deemed blasphemous. The order did not fade with time. More than thirty years later, in 2022, Rushdie was attacked while speaking in New York and permanently blinded in one eye. The long pursuit of that sentence shows how patient Iranian vengeance can be and how little it depends on borders, treaties, or decades.

Iranian operatives have repeatedly shown that their reach is global. In 2011, U.S. authorities disrupted a plot by the Quds Force (elite guard) to assassinate the Saudi ambassador in Washington. In 2022, the Justice Department charged an Iranian agent with trying to arrange the murder of former National Security Adviser John Bolton. These plots were not symbolic. They were calculated, Every long‑planned, and personal. Tehran’s leaders see justice as a sacred duty and revenge as an article of faith. American officials who helped plan or justify this war should understand the danger they have unleashed. Tehran does not draw fine lines between decision-makers and their families. Its definition of accountability can span generations and continents. The United States has initiated a conflict that will not end with its final airstrike. It has invited consequences that will travel and linger.

The Iraq War should have taught us this lesson. Americans were promised democracy, security, and swift victory, yet what followed was chaos, extremism, and loss. The same pattern is emerging again. Another administration claims it knows better than the past, that technology, resolve, or ideology will deliver a different result. The record of history suggests otherwise.

This new war began without credible intelligence, without an international coalition, and without a moral foundation. It is a policy built on vanity rather than vision. The public has not been given a single clear explanation worthy of the price demanded in American lives. It is soldiers who will die first, then perhaps civilians at home who will die later, victims of a vengeance foretold.

Trump’s phrase, “some people will die,” reduces everything to numbers. Yet these are not numbers. They are individuals with names and faces. They are young Americans wearing uniforms under a desert sun, Iranians defending what they believe to be sacred soil, and perhaps one day citizens in quiet towns far from any battlefield. The administration has mistaken dominance for wisdom, power for purpose, and violence for vision.

What comes next is predictable. There will be attacks that shock the public, condemnations from leaders who claim no one could have known, calls for unity against a foe we provoked. But this future has already been written. It is drawn from a history of arrogance, ignorance, and blindness, from the refusal of leaders to hear the warnings of experience.

Wars of choice always choose their own victims. Trump’s war with Iran will not stop at the front lines. It will reach embassies, airports, and neighborhoods. It will reach those who believed they were safe. Some people will die, as he said, but there will be many more than he imagined. When a nation starts an unjust war, it loses control not only of its enemies but of its own fate.


About the author ~
Van Abbott is a long time resident of Alaska and California. He has held financial management positions in government and private organizations in California, Kansas, and Alaska. He is retired and writes Op-Eds as a hobby. He served in the Peace Corps in the late sixties. You can find more of his commentaries and comments on life in America on Substack.





What do you think?
Whether you agree, disagree, or want to build on the ideas in this piece, we’d love to hear your voice. If you have an opinion you’d like to share — on this topic or any other — you can find our submission guidelines here: Sentinel submission guideline.

We welcome a wide range of viewpoints and would be glad to consider your perspective for publication on OurSentinel.com. . Send your letter or commentary to editor@oursentinel.com and help keep the community conversation moving forward.

TAGS:

Guest Commentary |
Stay alert for evil


Glenn doesn't like war or people being killed. Iran has been a constant supporter of terrorism and he hopes America's recent attack motivates Khamenei supported terrorists to chill out.


by Glenn Mollette, Guest Commentator




Glenn Mollette
President Donald Trump is obviously hated by some people on the planet. Anyone connected to the Ayatollah Khamenei most likely hates him. Anyone connected to Iranian terrorism hates him. Sadly, many American Democrats hate him. There have already been attempts to kill him and I fear there will be more from those connected to Iranian terrorism causes. Our Secret Service, FBI and others involved in protecting him are obviously aware that he is in constant danger. Let’s all please pray for his safety and for there to be no complacency in protecting him.

The news media is always reporting where he is located. I don’t think that wise. Whether he is in Mar-a-Lago, DC or New York City, is it really important that we all know? I don’t see how detailing his every location bodes well for his security. I am just a lowly voting citizen and what do I know? Not much, but I do belief these are perilous times as hostility from Iranian regime sympathizers is surely beyond the boiling point.


I doubt that the evil will all be totally destroyed and eliminated. We have to realize that in some way and some form there will be blowback.

We hope and pray that Iran can become a country run by the people of the country. Who knows how long and what this will involve. We were in Iraq and Afghanistan for a very long time. Can we really point to those countries and boast of success? Both countries are still a mess and we lost thousands of lives and spent trillions of dollars.

I do hope that President Trump is successful and that the Iranian people can take back their country. This would be good for them and the world.

In the meantime, while you are praying for the safety of our President, look over your own shoulder. All of us are vulnerable. The TSA needs our utmost support emotionally and financially. Surely by the time you read this Congress will have restored their pay. We are all vulnerable whether flying or being in any public place where people gather. School and churches are extremely vulnerable. Please increase your attention to security.

Terrorism extremism can raise its ugly head any place at any time. Crazy people do crazy stuff and many seem to be happy to sacrifice their own lives to further their causes.

I don’t like war or people being killed. However, Iran has been a constant supporter of terrorism. Khamenei has been the central figure and leader in the world of terror for about 37 years. That was far too long and there wasn’t any end in sight.

My prayer is that the attack will end and this will soon be over. However, I doubt that the evil will all be totally destroyed and eliminated. We have to realize that in some way and some form there will be blowback. Therefore, be alert, practice safety and try to help and look out for each other. The world doesn’t have to be a bad place. We can’t give up. Keep treating each other respectfully and kindly and stay alert to evil.


About the author ~

Glen Mollett is the author of 13 books including Uncommom Sense, the Spiritual Chocolate series, Grandpa's Store, Minister's Guidebook insights from a fellow minister. His column is published weekly in over 600 publications in all 50 states.




TAGS: Donald Trump is hated by people around the world, Iranian sympathizers are mad, American Democrats hate President Trump, terrorism can happen at any time, Americans should look out for each other

Letter to the Editor |
When transparency becomes the target, a whistleblower's view from the back row


A community whistleblower recounts the reaction to recording public meetings. In his letter, he argues that transparency should not provoke fear if the governmental body is operating above board.


Dear Editor,

Being a known whistleblower is a wild experience because, apparently, sitting quietly at a public meeting with a camera now counts as an act of aggression. I walk in, take a seat, hit record, and you would think I just pulled the fire alarm. Heads start swiveling, whispers start flying, and before long someone decides the real emergency in the room is me documenting what elected officials are saying into a microphone.

My personal favorite is when people start recording me while I am recording them, as if we have entered some strange standoff where the last camera standing wins. I am not sure what they think they are going to capture. A man sitting in a chair? A citizen listening? The suspense is unbearable.

Then there is the dramatic parking lot energy after adjournment, when a few brave souls suddenly find the courage to confront the man with the notebook. I usually make a polite early exit because I am not interested in late-night debates next to a shopping cart corral. I am there for one reason, and it is not small talk. I am there to go straight to the source of the problem and deal with it at the head, not nibble around the edges to make everyone feel comfortable.

Here is what makes it funny and telling at the same time. No one panics over a camera when everything is clean. No one cares about public records when there is nothing in them. The only time a whistleblower becomes the villain of the story is when the story has something in it worth hiding. If the strategy is to intimidate the person asking questions instead of answering them, that says more than any investigation ever could.

Every time the focus shifts to me instead of the issue, it confirms I am looking in the right place. Targeting a whistleblower does not protect the public. It protects whatever cannot survive daylight. And if that is the reaction, then I will keep showing up, keep recording and keep digging. Because if a camera and a notebook shake the room that much, imagine what the truth is doing.


Alec Severins
Georgetown


With over 17,000 followers, Alec Severins is the founder of the Vermilion County Watchdog community Facebook page, an independent media and investigative journalism organization.




TAGS:
  • letter to the editor about government transparency, whistleblower recording public meetings opinion, public records and open meetings accountability, citizen journalist documenting elected officials, intimidation concerns at local government meetings

  • Commentary |
    Measles is back! And it's worse than you think


    oursentinel.com viewpoint
    Haunting memories of a child's measles death in rural Nepal take on new urgency as the disease surges across America with over 900 cases in just six weeks. A former immunization team leader warns that declining vaccination rates threaten to return the U.S. to an era of preventable childhood deaths.


    oursentinel.com viewpoint
    by Mary Anne Mercer, MPH, DrPH


    The escalating number of measles infections in the U.S. brings haunting memories from the year I spent leading an immunization team in Nepal. I was trekking through a rural district without roads, electricity, or modern conveniences. We immunized kids under age five against diphtheria, tetanus, whooping cough, and tuberculosis, but a heat-stable measles vaccine was not yet available. Sadly, in those small villages the deadliest, most feared illness was measles.

    I wrote in my journal about a day I was called to see a child suffering from measles.

    We moved into the shadows of a low-slung house and stepped inside. An elderly woman sat on a mat, holding the now lifeless body of a small child, pale and still, in her arms. She was half-singing, half-crying an ancient sound of mourning, rocking him gently and fondling his face, arms, and legs. It was a painful sight, almost too difficult to witness. I took a deep breath, fighting back tears, an immense effort to keep my composure in the face of this tragic scene.

    “There’s the boy’s mother,” whispered the local health assistant, pointing with his chin to a younger woman weeping quietly next to the grandmother. In her arms was an older child, also suffering from measles. Other adults and children milled about the shadows of the room. Dust motes floated in the narrow beacon of sunlight streaming through one small window.

    We approached the two women with a deep namaste. “Kasto dukhha, Aama,” I said and bowed respectfully. So much pain. The child’s mother looked up with the saddest of eyes and nodded her acknowledgement.

    Before a vaccine was widely available, measles caused two to three million deaths around the world every year, most often among malnourished kids. The first measles vaccine required freezing and refrigeration at every point prior to injection, so it was years before a new formulation was available that could be used in areas without electricity. Even today, measles is still a leading cause of child death in poor countries, killing over 100,000 children annually.

    In pre-vaccine U.S., measles was an expected rite of passage for kids. “Just get it over with,” was the usual advice. During that era, around half a million U.S. kids came down with measles and roughly 500 of them died every year. When immunization programs were launched after 1963, the numbers gradually dropped to fewer than 100 cases a year by the late 1990s.

    But now -- it’s coming back. In 2025, more than 2200 cases were reported in the US, most in families with religious or other objections to immunizations. Three of them died. In only the first six weeks of 2026 over 900 cases have been reported, encompassing half the U.S. states. Among that group are many children of “anti-vaxxer” parents, who unknowingly put their children at risk by refusing the vaccine. Even college campuses are seeing a surge in infections because of generally lower immunization rates among incoming groups.

    Why such rapid spread? Measles is in fact one of the most infectious diseases we know: Just spending a few minutes in a room soon after a measles patient has left is enough exposure to lead to infection. Similarly, touching something contaminated by droplets from the sick person’s sneezing or coughing also will do it.

    We can combat deaths from measles with widespread vaccinations. “Herd immunity” for measles requires that 95% of susceptible people are vaccinated, and as coverage drops below that level, the risk of outbreaks increases. But the value of vaccines is apparently not understood by our Secretary of Health and Human Services, Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Though without formal health training, Kennedy has expressed unverified concerns about the safety of many routine childhood immunizations.

    Before President Trump took office, the U.S. was a major supporter of organizations providing vaccines and other basic health interventions for children around the world. But funding for vaccines meant to save children’s lives was cut by the Trump administration, and other sources of support have been slow to emerge. The result: many families—some who live in the most impoverished places on earth—are on their own to provide for their children’s health.

    Vaccines prevent kids’ dying from measles and other infectious diseases. We must not return to the era of tragic, needless child deaths that I encountered in Nepal - which could return to this country, unless we safeguard the system that protects our most vulnerable.


    About the author ~
    Dr. Mary Anne Mercer is a University of Washington public health faculty member and author whose four-decade career has focused on maternal and child health in developing nations. Beginning with her transformative year providing immunizations in rural Nepal in 1978, she has developed health projects in 14 countries and authored books including Beyond the Next Village (2022) and Sickness and Wealth: The Corporate Assault on Global Health. Her recent work strengthening midwifery care through mobile technology in Timor-Leste has been adopted as a national program.





    What do you think?
    Whether you agree, disagree, or want to build on the ideas in this piece, we’d love to hear your voice. If you have an opinion you’d like to share — on this topic or any other — you can find our submission guidelines here: Sentinel submission guideline.

    We welcome a wide range of viewpoints and would be glad to consider your perspective for publication on OurSentinel.com. . Send your letter or commentary to editor@oursentinel.com and help keep the community conversation moving forward.

    TAGS: measles outbreak 2026 United States cases, childhood vaccination rates declining America, RFK Jr vaccine policy concerns, herd immunity measles 95 percent threshold


    Editor's Choice


    Sentinel area baseball scores for April 4

    Rain and drizzle canceled all area baseball games except one. The Urbana Tigers traveled to Westville, hoping for a win. Unfortunately...


    More Sentinel Stories