Letter to the Editor |
MIT Replaces Harvard as Top U.S. College Destination

Dear Editor,

For decades, Harvard University was synonymous with academic prestige, but the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has recently surpassed it as the top university in the U.S. MIT’s commitment to intellectual rigor and meritocracy has redefined higher education, while Harvard’s reliance on legacy admissions and non-academic factors has undermined its academic credibility.

Harvard’s admissions policies prioritize legacy status, recruited athletes, and wealthy donors, admitting around 25% of students who lack exceptional academic qualifications. These practices are increasingly seen as unfair, diminishing Harvard’s reputation and aligning it with privilege over merit. Additionally, internal issues like declining applications, financial struggles, and controversies—including its mishandling of antisemitism and the resignation of its first Black president over plagiarism—have damaged its image further.

In contrast, MIT’s meritocratic admissions process ensures that only the most academically accomplished students are admitted, making it the top choice for the highest achieving students. Studies show that 72% of those accepted to both MIT and Harvard choose MIT, reflecting its growing appeal. MIT graduates earn higher starting salaries than those from Harvard, and its focus on technical expertise and problem-solving prepares students for today’s job market.

As Harvard’s legacy admissions continue, its brand is increasingly seen as a liability, especially in industries like tech and finance, where employers favor MIT’s rigorous academic standards. While Harvard’s prestige fades, MIT’s emphasis on innovation, intellectual curiosity, and academic excellence positions it as the future leader in higher education.


John Hoffman, Founder
Oliver Scholars
New York, NY



Unity focuses on conference title showdown at St. Joseph-Ogden after loss to Danville

TOLONO - In a hard-fought battle at the Rocket Center, the Unity Rockets (21-7) fell 76-69 to the Danville Vikings (8-17) in a non-conference matchup on Tuesday. Despite a strong first-half performance, Unity couldn't hold off Danville’s late surge, fueled by a dominant fourth quarter from CI Dye. The senior guard finished with 21 points—18 in the second half—including 11 in the final period to lead the Vikings’ 23-14 run.

Unity Athletics Dye wasn’t the only standout for Danville, as Jerry Reed III added 17 points and went a perfect 2-for-2 from the free-throw line, while Javaughn Robinson contributed 16 points, making all four of his free throws.

Unity controlled much of the game, taking a 38-32 halftime lead after hitting all nine of their second-quarter free throws. They entered the fourth quarter ahead 55-53 but couldn’t maintain their momentum. The Rockets shot well from the line overall, finishing 17-for-19. Brayden Henry led the way with a perfect 5-for-5 performance, and Colton Langendorf went 4-for-4. Overall, the Rockets were 17-for-19 from the line.

Dane Eisenmenger led Unity with a team-high 17 points, Henry finished with 13 points, and Langendorf chipped 10 points to lead the team's scoring effort in the loss.

With the loss behind them, the Rockets now turn their focus to a critical road matchup against St. Joseph-Ogden (18-7) tonight at 7 p.m. With an undefeated Illini Prairie Conference record on the line, a Unity win would secure them the outright conference championship. A loss, however, would create a potential tie for the title with the Spartans, who sit at 6-1 in IPC play.

The Rockets have navigated a challenging schedule this season leading up to this game, squaring off against larger programs and top-ranked teams, including three area Big 12 teams: Danville, Centennial, and Central, along with Tuetopolis and Lincoln-Way East. Playing away shouldn't pose a significant challenge for Unity, boasting an impressive 9-1 record on the road this season.



Commentary |
America can’t afford Trump’s mass deportations


For the cost of mass deportations, we could instead erase medical debt, provide universal school lunches, and end homelessness.


by Alliyah Lusuegro
      OtherWords


President Trump has made it clear that he’s dead set on attacking our immigrant friends, families, and neighbors — and that the only people he’ll protect are his loyalists and billionaires.

Since day one, Trump has launched a blatantly hateful agenda against immigrants. He’s issued executive orders that would unlawfully shut down asylum at the U.S. southern border, use the military to separate families, and make it easier to detain and deport migrants — including detaining them at the notorious Guantanamo Bay prison.

Meanwhile, anti-immigrant lawmakers in Congress gave Trump a helping hand by passing a law punishing undocumented people, including minors, with deportation for minor offenses — even if they’re not convicted.


Undocumented people contributed $96.7 billion in federal, state, and local taxes in 2022 — just one tax year, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

These attacks come at an enormous cost to the entire country. The American Immigration Council estimates that mass deportations will cost $88 billion per year over the course of a decade.

My colleagues and I calculated that this $88 billion could instead erase medical debt for 40 million Americans. Even just a fraction of it — $11 billion — could provide free lunch to all school children in the United States.

There are already 40,000 people locked up in detention centers — and Trump’s detention expansion plan would triple that capacity. Republicans in the House and Senate are proposing plans of an eye-popping  $175 billion or more to detain and deport undocumented people.

That’s enough to fund affordable housing for every unhoused person and household facing eviction in this country for several years — with about enough left over to make sure uninsured people with opioid use disorder can get treatment.

Illustration: Dee/Pixabay

Nor are these the only costs. Undocumented people contributed $96.7 billion in federal, state, and local taxes in 2022 — just one tax year, according to the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy. That’s nearly $100 billion in lost revenue a year that everyone else would end up having to cover.

But these attacks aren’t going unopposed. People are showing up for their immigrant neighbors and loved ones, making clear they simply won’t accept the nightmare of mass deportations and detentions.

The groups United We Dream, CASA, Make the Road States, and Action Lab recently pledged to build “a strong and sustainable movement to defend ourselves and our neighbors.” With their #CommunitiesNotCages campaign, Detention Watch Network is working with local communities to protest ICE actions and shut down detention centers.

And the list goes on.

On February 1, thousands of people blocked a highway in Los Angeles to protest against ICE raids. Just two days later, many gathered in solidarity for a Day Without Immigrants. On this day, students stayed home from school, employees didn’t show up to work, and over 250 businesses closed nationwide to show how important immigrants are to everyone’s day-to-day lives.

Others are using lawsuits to fight back. Five pregnant women, with the help of immigrant rights groups, sued the Trump administration’s attempt to end birthright citizenship. Agreeing with the mothers, three federal judges just blocked this unconstitutional order.

Meanwhile, the American Civil Liberties Union and other major legal organizations sued the administration for seeking to shut down asylum at the border — on the grounds that it’s a violation of long-time international and domestic law.

Finally, my fellow immigrants and I are also standing our ground. We’re stating the facts: Immigration is good for our country, our economy, and our culture — something 68 percent of Americans agree with. And we’re here to stay.

Immigrants are essential to this country. We bring opportunity and possibility to the United States. And not only do we contribute as students and professionals, business owners, and essential workers — we’re also human beings trying to live good and successful lives like anyone else. We’re a part of the American story.

Now and more than ever, we’ll continue to show up for each other — and we hope you will, too. Our lives and families depend on it.

Alliyah Lusuegro

Alliyah Lusuegro is the Outreach Coordinator for the National Priorities Project at the Institute for Policy Studies. This op-ed was distributed by OtherWords.org.



Subscribe
Read our latest health and medical news

Health & Wellness |
Ask your healthcare provider if a CT calcium screen is right for you

by Tim Ditman
OSF Healthcare
Ash Al-Dadah, MD
URBANA - Here’s something new to bring up the next time you visit your health care provider: Should I undergo a CT calcium score screen to take stock of my heart health? It’s not for everybody, but it could mean the difference between a long, healthy life and finding yourself on an operating table.

“The number one killer in the United States is heart disease,” says Ash Al-Dadah, MD, an interventional cardiologist at OSF HealthCare. “We have to do a better job.

“This calcium scoring is a screening where we may say ‘Hey, you need to exercise more’ or ‘Hey, we just found out you have high blood pressure. Let’s control that.’ or ‘Hey, you’re a smoker. Maybe you need to quit that,’” he adds. “We go after the risk factors that precipitate and lead to heart disease. It’s a wake-up call. Getting ahead of things so you’re not coming in with a heart attack and damage to the heart muscle. At that point, it’s too late.”

The screening
Dr. Al-Dadah says the 15-minute or so, non-invasive procedure is similar to other CT [computed tomography] scans. “A fancy X-ray,” he calls it. You lie down, and a doughnut-looking device surrounds you and takes pictures of your heart.

“The arteries in our heart are supposed to be flesh and appear gray [on the imaging]. As we roll the body through the scan, we want to see all gray,” Dr. Al-Dadah explains. “But if there’s hardening and plaque formation in the arteries, it will light up as white. That’s because plaque as it ages forms calcification. There are calcium deposits.”

You could be told you’re at low, medium or high risk. Or, providers may look at the results based on your age compared to the typical amount of plaque found in a person of that age.

Put simply: “It’s one way to measure risk for heart disease,” Dr. Al-Dadah says. “The most common heart disease is blocked arteries, leading to a risk for heart attacks and other issues.”Cardiologists and radiologists have a scoring system based on how much plaque is found.

Next steps
Dr. Al-Dadah says if your screen comes back with red flags, you’ll want to see a cardiologist to discuss next steps. That could mean more tests, especially if you have daily symptoms like chest pain or shortness of breath:
  • A stress test, where you walk and run on a treadmill while providers see how your heart functions.
  • A coronary angiogram, which provides more comprehensive images of your arteries.
  • Or, a provider could recommend you get another CT calcium screen in a few years.

Plaque in heart
Other treatment options for milder cases: “Even if your cholesterol level is normal, I could still put you on a medication class called statins. Statins reduce plaque thickness. They stabilize the plaque and reduce the risk for heart attack,” Dr. Al-Dadah outlines.

“I could put you on aspirin. Aspirin will dramatically reduce the risk for a heart attack if you have significant plaque,” he adds.

One other outcome of note: Though rare, Dr. Al-Dadah says your CT calcium screen could come back OK, but you could still have a heart issue soon after. No screening is a silver bullet to keep you 100% healthy, in other words. That’s why it’s important to follow your provider’s recommendations and practice healthy habits, like eating a balanced diet, exercising and ditching the cigarettes.

For me?
Who is this screening intended for? Dr. Al-Dadah says it’s often done on people aged 40 to 65 or people with a family history of heart disease. But, anyone can and should ask their provider about it.

“If you’re 75 and have diabetes,” for example, Dr. Al-Dadah says. “You’re going to have a lot of calcification in the arteries. But it does not signify blockages. It’s just hardening of the arteries that comes with age. But if you’re younger and have that calcification, that’s a marker for risk of heart disease and heart attack.”



More Sentinel Stories



Photo Galleries


Monticello Basketball vs Seneca
January 11, 2025
30 Photos

January 11, 2025
37 Photos

January 11, 2025
31 Photos

January 4, 2025
42 Photos

December 14, 2024
39 Photos

December 7, 2024
27 Photos