Elected officials see rise in political violence. Threats from constituents could make it hard to find people willing to serve their communities.
by Judith Ruiz-Branch Public News Service CHICAGO - A pivotal voting season is underway and research shows threats and harassment against public officials can increase during election periods.
More than 50% of elected officials included in a recent Princeton survey said they have already experienced at least one form of hostility this year. Separate findings from the University of Illinois-Chicago show roughly 60% of mayors and nearly half of municipal and county officials have received threats since 2022.
Alexandra Filindra, professor of political science and psychology at the university, said the numbers could be even higher because some officials worry reporting a threat makes the problem worse.
"Elected officials are reluctant to talk about what is happening to them because they're afraid that it will invite more political violence to their door," Filindra explained.
Filindra noted they may also be reluctant to support security measures or policies to address the violence because they think it could be seen as self-dealing rather than a legitimate response to safety risks. She added the intimidation is not necessarily politically motivated but there is a partisan divide in how people perceive the threats.
Her research showed nearly 80% of respondents view safety concerns raised by officials from their own party as legitimate, compared with about 30% for officials from the other party.
Filindra pointed to growing inequality, rising costs and reduced access to healthcare and other government services as factors leaving more people frustrated and in need, sometimes with local officials as their most accessible point of contact. She stressed they need to be hard on the problems, not the people.
"It is perfectly understandable that one gets angry at a decision and that a decision is not fair but threats and doxing and showing up at somebody's home and threatening their kids is not acceptable," Filindra emphasized.
With many local government positions having low pay or even being voluntary, she warned threats could make it harder to recruit people willing to serve in local or state government. In the Princeton report, 76% of surveyed officials said hostility concerns make them less willing to participate in at least one political or civic activity.
Other stories you might like ...
TAGGED: hostility is scaring away politicians, more people frustrated and in need, threats against candidates increase during election periods, more than half of the mayors in the US have been threatened
The Jack Smith smear reveals a larger campaign of corruption and revenge says guest columnist Van Abbott.
by Van Abbott Guest Contributor
When Sen. Eric Schmitt called Jack Smith a “total dirtbag,” he was offering an insult where evidence should have been.
Schmitt came to the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing prepared for a televised execution. He implied that Smith had lied under oath and secretly met with Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis. The centerpiece was a basketball game Schmitt presented as evidence of Smith's deception.
Then the basketball game turned out not to be the game Schmitt thought it was.
Schmitt claimed Smith had attended an Atlanta Hawks NBA game in Atlanta on February 3, 2024. Smith had actually attended a women's college basketball game between Iowa and Maryland in College Park, Maryland. Schmitt had confused the Hawkeyes with the Hawks.
The supposed perjury evidence disappeared with the correction.
Schmitt established neither perjury nor conspiracy, nor did he show that Smith's investigation of Donald Trump was corrupt.
He called Smith a dirtbag.
The strategy was simple: smear, spectacle, retaliation. The charge lands first; evidence… arrives too late.
And the victims are not imaginary.
David Hearn, a former Olympic canoeist, was charged with felony destruction of government property after being accused of damaging the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool. Prosecutors later received evidence that the damage resulted from a botched contractor installation. The Justice Department moved to dismiss the case. On October 1, a D.C. judge went further, dismissing it with prejudice and preventing prosecutors from bringing the charge again. The judge cited the “exceptional circumstances” and the government's previous errors.
A citizen should not need a judge's permanent protection from a prosecution.
The case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia is more disturbing still. A federal judge dismissed federal human-smuggling charges after finding that the prosecution was brought to punish Abrego Garcia for successfully challenging his wrongful deportation. The judge described the evidence as reflecting “an abuse of prosecuting power.”
These cases involve different people and allegations. But they raise the same question: What happens when challenging the government makes you a target of the government?
Law and order means evidence before indictment, due process before punishment and equal justice before political loyalty. It does not mean selecting a target first, constructing a narrative second and searching for a charge last.
So why the appetite for vengeance?
Look at what it protects.
The Trump administration is surrounded by continuing questions about conflicts of interest, presidential self-dealing and the influence of wealthy interests. One example is difficult to dismiss as ordinary political fundraising. In 2025, top purchasers of Trump's $TRUMP cryptocurrency were invited to a private dinner with the president. Unlike conventional campaign contributions, purchases of the Trump-linked cryptocurrency could directly generate profits for Trump.
The person demanding answers becomes the target.
That is not merely access to a politician. It is access connected to an asset from which the president's family profits.
And the money-for-access model has continued. In 2026, another Trump-linked crypto venture offered investors who locked up $5 million in tokens for six months in what the company called “guaranteed direct access” to members of its business-development team.
But they illustrate why transparency matters when presidential power and private financial interests occupy the same room.
The administration's response to criticism has too often been deflection: attack the reporter, attack the watchdog, attack the judge, attack the prosecutor. If the accusation cannot survive scrutiny, change the subject.
Questions about power are answered with attacks on the questioner. The investigation becomes the scandal. The investigator becomes the villain. The person demanding answers becomes the target.
Corruption and retribution are not separate problems when the machinery of government can be used to distract from questions about how power is being exercised.
Each ethics question gets a new enemy. Each demand for accountability becomes “persecution.” Each investigation into presidential conduct becomes an opportunity to investigate the investigator.
The result is politics in which spectacle replaces scrutiny and loyalty replaces accountability.
Republicans should be campaigning on wages, housing, health care, retirement security and the economic dignity of working Americans. Instead, too much of their political energy is consumed by enemies, insults and investigations of those who challenge the president.
Fear is cheaper than governing.
So the next time a Republican senator calls someone a dirtbag, listen past the insult.
Listen for what it is meant to cover: the unanswered question, the missing evidence, the undisclosed favor, the money changing hands.
Because when an insult becomes the evidence, the person being smeared may not be the real target.
The real target is accountability itself.
About the author ~ Van Abbott is a long time resident of Alaska and California. He has held financial management positions in government and private organizations in California, Kansas, and Alaska. He is retired and writes Op-Eds as a hobby. He served in the Peace Corps in the late sixties. You can find more of his commentaries and comments on life in America on Substack.
More Editorial Viewpoints
What do you think?
Whether you agree, disagree, or want to build on the ideas in this piece, we’d love to hear your voice. If you have an opinion you’d like to share — on this topic or any other — you can find our submission guidelines here: Sentinel submission guideline.
We welcome a wide range of viewpoints and would be glad to consider your perspective for publication on OurSentinel.com. Send your letter or commentary to editor@oursentinel.com and help keep the community conversation moving forward.
Traveling with allergies takes some planning, but a little preparation can help keep symptoms and unexpected reactions from disrupting a vacation. From packing medications in a carry-on to researching potential allergens at your destination, health experts recommend preparing before leaving home.
by Paul Arco OSF Healthcare
A much-anticipated vacation should be about exploring new places and relaxing with family and friends – not scrambling to find a pharmacy because you forgot your allergy medication.
Whether you’re headed for a tropical getaway or hiking through a national forest, a little preparation can go a long way toward keeping allergies from putting a damper on your trip, according to Stephanie Amor-Arteaga, APRN, a nurse practitioner with OSF HealthCare.
Stephanie Amor-Arteaga, APRN
“The best way to prepare for a vacation is to plan if you have allergies,” she says. “You want to make sure that you have enough medication, you've gotten your refills from your provider and you have enough to last you through the trip. Make sure everybody around you is aware of the allergies and what you have with you.”
Because allergy triggers vary by season and destination, preparation starts before you leave home. Research where you’re going to know your response to potential environmental allergies there and how to best cope.
Before leaving home, Amor-Arteaga recommends putting together an allergy kit. Depending on your needs, that may include antihistamines, inhalers and epinephrine auto-injectors. Travelers should also bring a current medication list, emergency contacts and a medical alert bracelet or necklace, as well as hand sanitizer and wipes. Make sure all prescriptions are current and properly labeled in case your travel partners need additional information.
Amor-Arteaga says that if you're carrying prescription medications or over-the-counter medications, place them in your carry-on and not in your checked-in luggage for easy access.
Depending on your ultimate location, other considerations to think about are pollen levels, air quality, what outdoor activities you have planned and possible allergens when it comes to hotel accommodations.
Who’s ready to eat?
Once you’ve arrived at your destination it’s time to think about where you’re going to dine and what you’re going to eat – especially if you’re allergic to certain foods or ingredients.
“If you have a food allergy, the best way to navigate that at a restaurant is to let the staff know about your allergy before you even start to order the food,” says Amor-Arteaga. “I have a daughter with a food allergy, so I make sure to carry snacks that she's able to eat in case that restaurant does not have any options for her.”
Amor-Arteaga knows firsthand how stressful traveling with a food allergy can be. Her daughter has a peanut allergy, and Amor-Arteaga remembers being nervous before their first big vacation to Disney World.
“I just wanted to make sure there was no cross contamination, but they were very good about it,” she says. “Most places are good about managing food allergies because they are common, unfortunately.”
Amor-Arteaga suggests contacting your health care provider at least four weeks in advance of your trip so he or she can devise a personalized plan for you, including making sure all your prescriptions are filled.
The bottom line, Amor-Arteaga says, is that allergies shouldn’t keep people from enjoying their time away. A little preparation before leaving home can help travelers spend less time worrying about their allergies – and more time making memories.
“Allergies affect our lives, and it may be a bummer for some, but it should not affect a vacation if you plan and get everything in order so that you can enjoy time with everybody,” says Amor-Arteaga.
More Healthcare Stories
TAGS: traveling with allergies vacation preparation tips, how to manage food allergies while traveling, allergy medication travel packing tips, vacation planning for people with allergies, how to prepare for seasonal allergies while traveling
Medicaid and the Children's Health Insurance Program offer free or low-cost coverage for eligible children and teens, with enrollment available throughout the year.
Illustrations: Mahathelge Ahmad Supriyanto/Pixabay
Feature Impact - Once school starts, life moves fast. There is homework, practices, permission slips, and early mornings. Before the calendar fills up, take a moment to make sure your child has health coverage for the year ahead.
Free or low-cost health coverage is available through the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) or Medicaid in your state for eligible individuals. With health coverage, your kids and teens can get the care they need to stay healthy and do well in school.
Think your family might not qualify? You might be surprised. Many families may qualify for coverage without realizing it! Eligibility varies by state and is based on family income and household size. In most states, children up to age 19 from a family of four earning up to $80,000 per year may be eligible. In some states, eligible children can still qualify if family income is even higher.
Getting your child covered helps you get them the health care they may need. When a child is sick, the right medicines help them get back to school. If a child has a tough time focusing, there are supports to help. If your child does not see as well as other children, these programs cover glasses. Healthy kids are confident kids, who are ready to participate in every opportunity inside and outside the classroom!
Why Health Coverage Belongs on Your Kids' Back-to-School List
Having health coverage can help families, like yours, to send your kids and teens off to school ready to learn. Depending on the program and a child's individual needs, Medicaid and CHIP can provide eligible kids up to age 18 (Medicaid) or 19 (CHIP) with a range of services to support their health all year long, such as:
Annual checkups and school physicals to prepare children to learn, play, and participate.
Preventive care to identify health needs early and keep children healthy throughout the year.
Dental care to help prevent tooth aches, cavities, and missed school days.
Vision and hearing services to support learning and classroom participation.
Mental health care to support emotional well-being and school success.
Prescription medications and treatment to help manage symptoms and stay on track.
Specialized services for children with disabilities to support growth and learning.
How to Apply
You can apply for Medicaid and CHIP in many ways:
By phone
By mail
In-person through your state's Medicaid or CHIP office
Or find your state's information online at InsureKidsNow.gov/coverage.
Act now to get your child covered before they need health care. Enrollment for these programs is open year-round, meaning families do not have to wait for a specific time of year to get covered.
Once enrolled, coverage must be renewed every twelve months, so it is important to keep your address, email, and phone number up to date with your state Medicaid or CHIP office to avoid missing important renewal information. Visit InsureKidsNow.gov or call 1-877-KIDS-NOW (1-877-543-7669) for more information.
Information provided by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. This communication was printed, published, or produced and disseminated at U.S. taxpayer expense.
More Healthcare Stories
back to school Medicaid and CHIP enrollment, children's health insurance before school starts, how to apply for CHIP health coverage, Medicaid eligibility for children by state, free low-cost health insurance for kids
A Medicaid omnibus bill approved by Illinois lawmakers will remove eligibility for thousands of residents as the state adjusts to new federal requirements. Advocates warn the change could expand the uninsured population while lawmakers cite legal and budget constraints.
by Peter Hancock Capitol News Illinois SPRINGFIELD – A bill that will soon head to Gov. JB Pritzker’s desk will officially remove an estimated 10,000 people from the state’s Medicaid program, leaving them without any form of health coverage.
That group is made up mainly of people who are not U.S. citizens but who are in the country legally, according to the Illinois Coalition for Immigrant and Refugee Rights. That includes refugees and asylum-seekers, many of whom came to the United States with pre-existing health conditions.
“If they are enrolled, then they still have Medicaid up until Oct. 1,” Edith Avila Hesser, ICIRR’s health justice and policy director, said in an interview. “This adds to the number of uninsured populations that we have here in the state of Illinois, and so obviously we will be working to educate this community about the resources that are available to them through community clinics like FQHCs (Federally Qualified Health Centers) and free and charitable clinics available throughout the state.”
Medicaid is a public health coverage program that is jointly funded by the federal government and the states.
In 2025, Congress amended the federal eligibility rules for Medicaid with passage of H.R. 1, commonly known as President Donald Trump’s “One Big Beautiful Bill Act.” It removed eligibility for nearly all noncitizens except lawful permanent residents, Cuban and Haitian entrants, and migrants from certain Pacific island nations known as the Compact of Free Association.
Illinois’ Medicaid bill
In order to comply with that change in federal law, Illinois lawmakers included language in this year’s annual Medicaid omnibus bill, Senate Bill 3365, removing most groups of noncitizens from eligibility under state law.
They include, among others, immigrants who are honorably discharged U.S. veterans and their families, refugees and asylees, noncitizens identified as victims of trafficking, Amerasians from Vietnam, and American Indians born in Canada.
“We had to make that change to comply with H.R. 1 so that we didn't put our entire Medicaid program in jeopardy,” Rep. Anna Moeller, D-Elgin, who chairs the House working group that wrote the omnibus bill, said in an interview.
Although Illinois also provides health coverage outside the Medicaid system that is funded entirely with state dollars, the language in this year’s bill specifically states that it “shall not require any category of non-citizens or part thereof to be funded at state-only cost.”
For example, in 2020, Illinois launched a program to provide Medicaid-like coverage known as Health Benefits for Immigrant Seniors for noncitizens age 65 and over, regardless of their immigration status. The following year, it expanded that program with Health Benefits for Immigrant Adults, which covered adults age 42 to 64, regardless of immigration status.
But the latter program was closed in 2025 amid budget and political pressure and enrollment in the seniors program has been limited while many of its enrollees have been shifted to other subsidized coverage programs.
Stalled programs
Illinois also participates in a limited program that provides health benefits to asylum applicants and victims of torture, trafficking and other serious crimes. And to minimize the impact of the upcoming change in eligibility rules, immigrant rights advocates introduced legislation this year to expand that program.
House Bill 4824, sponsored by Rep. Dagmara Avelar, D-Romeoville, and Senate Bill 3462, sponsored by Sen. Graciela Guzmán, D-Chicago, would have extended coverage under that program to several additional categories of noncitizens who are in the country for various humanitarian reasons. But neither of those bills was ever assigned to a substantive committee.
Moeller said budget pressures were the primary reason the bills were not considered this year, and she said that is not likely to change anytime soon.
“We're looking at enormous budget pressures next year because of the cuts in H.R. 1 to the Medicaid program, which is going to affect our overall budget,” she said. “Hopefully, at some point we can get many of the provisions that were contained in H.R. 1 overturned federally.”
Capitol News Illinois is a nonprofit, nonpartisan news service that distributes state government coverage to hundreds of news outlets statewide. It is funded primarily by the Illinois Press Foundation and the Robert R. McCormick Foundation.
Other stories you might like ...
Illinois Medicaid eligibility changes 2026, Illinois immigrant health coverage legislation, Senate Bill 3365 Medicaid Illinois, federal Medicaid rule changes Illinois, Illinois health coverage for noncitizens
A proposed White House ballroom expansion is being defended by Republicans as a security measure, but critics argue the justification masks a costly luxury project. The debate has sparked broader questions about priorities, spending, and political messaging.
by Van Abbott Guest Contributor
Republicans now expect Americans to believe the greatest threat to presidential security is insufficient ballroom space at the White House.
That claim insults common sense from the first syllable to the last.
President Trump spends enormous amounts of time at golf resorts, private clubs, fundraisers, and sprawling luxury properties where security teams must defend open terrain, moving crowds, tree lines, beaches, roads, kitchens, docks, guests, staff, and endless unpredictable variables. Yet Republicans now insist the republic itself hinges on constructing a taxpayer-funded ceremonial palace in Washington.
Apparently the assassins lurk near the appetizer table.
Senators Lindsey Graham, Katie Britt, and Eric Schmitt push the argument with almost comic determination. They insist a massive White House ballroom will reduce risk because presidents can host events on secure grounds instead of traveling elsewhere. Trump echoes the sales pitch, portraying the ballroom as a fortress disguised as a banquet hall.
The logic collapses instantly.
If the White House is safest, why does Trump constantly leave it? If security is paramount, why normalize exposure on golf courses while demanding public money for chandeliers and gala space? If this project is indispensable, why did previous presidents survive without a taxpayer-funded palace wing?
Because this is not about security.
It is about spectacle.
Republicans understand the power of the word “security.” The moment they invoke it, scrutiny softens, questions fade, wallets open. Security justifies everything. Security excuses everything. Security sanctifies everything.
That is the lie.
The proposal itself ballooned from a supposedly donor-funded improvement into a sprawling luxury complex whose total cost could approach a billion dollars once infrastructure, renovations, and security modifications are fully counted. The price grows, the promises shrink, the excuses multiply.
First came the ballroom. Then came the “enhancements.” Then came the “necessary security infrastructure.” Washington always speaks softly before it reaches for the taxpayer’s wallet.
And Republicans expect Americans to swallow all of it while lecturing working families about fiscal discipline.
They preach austerity to workers, restraint to retirees, sacrifice to families. Then they sprint toward taxpayer-funded opulence the instant Trump wants a grander stage.
The hypocrisy does not merely drip. It floods.
A party that once howled about deficits now treats public money like confetti at a coronation. Citizens are told the nation cannot afford expanded healthcare, affordable housing, modern infrastructure, stronger retirement protections, or struggling public schools. Scarcity always governs ordinary Americans. Abundance always appears for the powerful.
Not for schools.
Not for hospitals.
Not for citizens.
For a ballroom.
The symbolism could not be clearer if Republicans installed a gold throne beneath the chandelier.
They are not constructing a security project. They are constructing a monument. A monument to excess. A monument to ego. A monument to the transformation of conservatism from a philosophy of restraint into a personality cult draped in velvet and gold.
The ballroom Itself becomes an almost perfect metaphor for modern Republican politics. Ornate on the surface, hollow underneath. Loud, glittering, theatrical, expensive. A political Versailles where image matters more than principle and loyalty matters more than truth.
They wrap luxury in patriotism. They wrap vanity in fear. They wrap indulgence in the flag.
And still the contradictions pile higher than the marble columns they want taxpayers to finance.
Assassins do not hide in White House banquet halls waiting beside the shrimp cocktail. Threats emerge during travel, motorcades, public appearances, outdoor recreation, and unscripted movement through unsecured environments. Every security professional understands this. Republicans understand it too. That is precisely why the ballroom argument feels so cynical. They are not selling protection. They are selling prestige wrapped in patriotic packaging, a palace marketed as policy, excess repainted as emergency.
And that is what makes the ballroom lie so revealing. Republicans now demand that Americans confuse luxury with leadership, extravagance with patriotism, and a presidential palace with national security.
The ballroom Is not protection. It is propaganda wrapped in gold leaf.
About the author ~ Van Abbott is a long time resident of Alaska and California. He has held financial management positions in government and private organizations in California, Kansas, and Alaska. He is retired and writes Op-Eds as a hobby. He served in the Peace Corps in the late sixties. You can find more of his commentaries and comments on life in America on Substack.
More Editorial Viewpoints
TAGS: White House ballroom controversy, Republican security argument criticism, Trump White House spending debate, political symbolism luxury government spending, Capitol political opinion analysis
What do you think?
Whether you agree, disagree, or want to build on the ideas in this piece, we’d love to hear your voice. If you have an opinion you’d like to share — on this topic or any other — you can find our submission guidelines here: Sentinel submission guideline.
We welcome a wide range of viewpoints and would be glad to consider your perspective for publication on OurSentinel.com. . Send your letter or commentary to editor@oursentinel.com and help keep the community conversation moving forward.
Community members across Champaign County donated nearly 1,000 hygiene products during a monthlong drive organized by the Illinois Extension office. The effort supported the CLU-W Hygiene Pantry and helped provide essential items for local families in need.
CHAMPAIGN - Community members across Champaign County helped nearly 1,000 hygiene products reach local families in need during a monthlong donation drive organized by the Illinois Extension office in Champaign.
The Champaign County Extension office hosted its first Hygiene Drive throughout April in support of the CLU-W Hygiene Pantry of Champaign County, collecting personal care and household essentials for individuals and families struggling with the rising cost of basic hygiene items.
By the time the drive wrapped up April 30, volunteers had gathered 139 full-size products and 850 travel-size items for a total of 989 donated goods.
“This is the first hygiene drive that has been led at the Champaign County Extension office, and it was a smashing success,” organizers said in a release announcing the results.
Donations arrived steadily throughout the month as residents stopped by the Extension office with bags of soap, shampoo, toothpaste, deodorant and other daily necessities. Organizers said some community members specifically shopped for the drive before dropping off supplies.
One donor contributed handmade organic soaps and lotions produced for a small business, while others expressed interest in continuing to support the hygiene pantry after the April campaign ended.
The donation box filled quickly enough that volunteers emptied it weekly before transporting items to the CLU-W Hygiene Pantry.
The pantry was established to address the growing financial burden many families face when purchasing basic hygiene products. The organization distributes free hygiene essentials to local residents who may not otherwise be able to afford them.
Illinois Extension officials said the goal of the drive was to help ensure community members have access to products that support health, dignity and well-being.
More information about the CLU-W Hygiene Pantry of Champaign County is available at www.cluwhygienepantry.org or by calling 217-249-8971.
TAGS: Champaign County hygiene drive donations, Illinois Extension community service project, CLU-W Hygiene Pantry support campaign, hygiene product donations for families, local nonprofit pantry Champaign County
Advocates say Illinois women played a defining role in the state’s newly passed medical aid-in-dying law. Their stories and leadership helped shape the first legislation of its kind in the Midwest.
by Judith Ruiz-Branch Public News Service
CHICAGO - March is Women’s History Month and an organization advocating for end-of-life reform is highlighting the significant role of women from Illinois in driving the movement.
The state recently became the first in the Midwest to legalize medical aid in dying.
Callie Riley, regional advocacy director for Compassion & Choices, said Illinois residents Suzy Flack and Deborah Robertson were instrumental in getting the legislation passed. Riley noted the bill is nicknamed “Deb's Law” because of Robertson, who served as a leader despite living with a rare form of cancer.
"The work we do is really driven by the stories of people who are directly impacted by both good end-of-life care and end-of-life care that falls short," Riley explained. "In my experience, so many of our storytellers, our volunteers, our leaders, our advocates are women."
Riley pointed out Flack became an advocate after witnessing her son, who was diagnosed with terminal cancer, die peacefully and autonomously using medical aid in another state. Deb’s Law takes effect in Illinois in September.
Riley added the historical roots of the movement for better end-of-life-care dates back to the early HIV epidemic. Alternative care networks developed because people living with HIV and AIDS did not receive adequate care from the traditional medical system.
"It was predominantly women providing that care; queer women, straight women, people who knew and loved people who were living with HIV," Riley recounted. "To me, it's not surprising that has continued."
Riley stressed increased advocacy has created a dialogue about the importance of autonomy in end-of-life decisions, with supporters long pushing for medical aid in dying legislation in Illinois. It is currently legal in 12 other states.
More on Illinois
TAGS: Illinois women advocates, Deb’s Law Illinois, medical aid in dying Midwest, Compassion & Choices Illinois, end-of-life reform movement
As golf season begins, OSF HealthCare physical therapist Michael Hahndorf recommends beginning with home stretching routines and practice swings before visiting the driving range, starting with small buckets rather than large ones. Key elements of injury prevention include proper swing posture and daily stretching routines.
Photo: Kampus Productions/PEXELS
That first swing of golf season can come with risk if your body isn't ready. Tips for preventing injuries include stretching routines and practice swings maintaining proper posture throughout your swing.
by Paul Arco OSF Healthcare
Every year, more than 500 million golf rounds are played on courses across the country. And while anxious golfers are racing to local courses for a quick round, that first swing of the season can come with a risk if your body isn’t ready.
“I think about the low back, especially the population that plays golf tends to be a little bit older sometimes,” says Michael Hahndorf, a physical therapist with OSF HealthCare. The lower back, the shoulders. You think about the arms and wrists are important, but you don't want to forget about your foundation as well – your legs, your ankles, your knees, your hips, all that is important too. It goes back to just stretching and being more prepared for what's coming when you do play.”
Hahndorf recommends starting a stretching routine. Before starting any round, give yourself at least 10-15 minutes to properly stretch your back, hamstrings, abdominals, arms and shoulders to stay flexible. And make sure to get plenty of practice swings in before you head over to the first tee. Start with the smaller irons and work your way up to the driver and not just on the first hole with the first swing.
Walking nine or 18 holes can be challenging, especially if you’ve been mostly sedentary for the past several months. Even carrying a golf bag can cause back and shoulder pain.
Start walking to warm up
“Start to walk nice and easy. Get your body used to kind of physical activity again, taking some swings at home without even going to the driving range,” Hahndorf says. “It could be something as simple as going to the driving range and hitting a small bucket versus large, and then kind of working your way into nine holes for a little bit, and then slowly transitioning to those 18 holes. Because it's going to be a big change of pace from nine to 18 over the course of time.”
Photo: Sentinel/Clark Brooks
Walking after months of inactivity can be challenging. To get back into top form, start with stretching and work up gradually to prevent early-season golf injuries.
For the most part, golf is a relatively safe sport, but injuries can happen, especially because of not using proper form or technique. The keys of a good swing include good posture, a stable lower back, and a slow relaxed swing. An early-season injury, especially during cooler temperatures, can really set back a golfer for a few days to weeks.
“When it comes to a good golf swing, you think about having good posture and having a flat back,” Hahndorf says. “Have your hips tucked underneath you, have your knees bent a little and those arms straight down. Posture plays a role importantly there, because it's going to allow for that rotation.”
And remember to spend some time stretching again following when the round is over. “It's important to stretch before to warm up but also afterwards, so you can kind of get ahead of some of that soreness. Because it can be tough for the first couple rounds,” says Hahndorf. “Just maintain just a gentle stretching routine for five to 10 minutes a day to keep that low back, hip, shoulder mobility kind of where it was when you ended.”
A little soreness is expected early in the golf season. But any pain that lingers or gets worse might call for physical therapy. Touch base with your medical provider with any nagging concerns.
“Just take care of your body. If something hurts, pay attention,” Hahndorf says. “You know how things are supposed to feel. So, if it feels off make sure you're reaching out if you need to.”
More Healthcare Stories
TAGS: golf injury prevention tips stretching routine, lower back pain golf season prevention, OSF HealthCare physical therapy golf injuries, how to prepare body for golf season
Tyler Stratman spent years in debilitating back pain, unable to walk a city block without stopping — until a minimally invasive spine procedure gave him his life back the same day he had surgery.
by Colleen Reynolds OSF Healthcare
PEORIA - After years of chronic pain stripped away his active lifestyle, 36-year-old Tyler Stratman of Clinton, Illinois, says he has finally reclaimed his life thanks to a specialized spine procedure now available in Central Illinois.
Stratman, who once ran several miles a day while living in Chicago, says his life changed dramatically when persistent back pain began about two and a half years ago. What started as discomfort escalated into debilitating immobility.
Active lifestyle disrupted by chronic back pain
I don’t think I slept for probably four to five days...
The pain prompted Stratman to completely stop his habit of running four to five miles a day.
“Even walking down the street to get Starbucks, my whole entire body would just kind of charley horse. I would have to stop in between blocks and kind of do hamstring stretches and things like that. And you know I was only 33 years old. And so, it was a huge, huge part of my life taken away.”
An MRI eventually revealed a severe herniated disc in his lower spine. At its peak, Stratman describes unbearable pain and sleepless nights.
“I don’t think I slept for probably four to five days,” Stratman explains. “I would have to go out in the middle of the night. We have a treadmill and I would have to go out at like three or four in the morning to walk just to relieve something – just so I wouldn’t feel pain.”
Minimally invasive spine surgery offers new option in Central Illinois
Photo provided
Dr. Sohail Syed, MD
After exhausting non-surgical options including physical therapy, steroid injections and chiropractic care, Stratman was referred to neurosurgeon Sohail Syed, MD, who specializes in minimally invasive endoscopic spine surgery.
Spine surgeons at OSF HealthCare Illinois Neurological Institute (OSF INI) Spine Institute perform approximately 1,000 spine surgeries each year, more than any other hospital system in the area and is the second largest program in Illinois. OSF HealthCare began using new minimally invasive spine surgery technology in June 2024, expanding treatment options for patients with certain spinal conditions. Since then, fellowship-trained spine surgeon Dr. Syed has performed 50 non-invasive spine surgeries using this advanced approach.
The endoscopic approach uses a small camera and specialized instruments inserted through a narrow pathway, avoiding the need for large incisions or significant tissue disruption.
Dr. Syed notes that in traditional spine surgery, surgeons often must remove bone and move a nerve aside to reach the problem area – steps the endoscopic technique can often minimize or avoid.
Endoscopic spine surgery reduces damage and recovery time
“Rather than going through all that, you can sneak underneath the nerve. And the endoscopic camera has an angle on it so it lets you look around the corner and work in the natural hole that exists in the spine without removing any bone or tissue and go right to the disc, remove the disc that’s pushing on the nerve or the bone spur and be in and out just using a one to two centimeter incision.”
Dr. Syed emphasizes that surgery is typically a last resort after conservative treatments fail but says Stratman was an ideal candidate due to both his condition and mindset.
“He was a great candidate for endoscopic spine surgery because of the type of disc herniation he had, the location, his age and his attitude,” Dr. Syed emphasizes, “He was really willing to do the work required after to get the best benefit from the surgery.”
Stratman ultimately chose the less invasive option that allowed surgeons to access his spine through a natural pathway while he remained partially awake. Though initially daunting, he says the decision became clear after years of suffering.
It offered him hope and following a two-and-a-half-hour procedure, the results were almost immediate.
Finding immediate relief
Non-invasive spine surgery
“It was an instant relief. The kind of like nugget charley horse I just felt like I had in my back for those years – it was just gone. I didn’t feel it anymore,” he explains.
Stratman was also relieved he didn’t have to travel to St. Louis or Chicago for the innovative surgical approach. He was back home the same day – seven hours after his surgery.
Dr. Syed notes that while some people experience immediate improvement, recovery timelines can vary depending on the severity and duration of nerve compression.
Photo: Courtesy OSF
Surgery removes whatever’s causing an injury, but Dr. Syed reminds people the procedure doesn’t repair injury.
The body has to heal on its own, and that can take time. For some older patients, Dr. Syed cautions it could mean a few months before they feel significantly better.
“While the nerve is being hurt, so is the muscle, so is the skin and for all of that to recover, it can take time – especially for older patients. So, if you wake up feeling great, that’s awesome. But if you don’t, give it at least three months.”
Now several months post-surgery, Stratman says he feels stronger and more mobile than ever.
“I’m better than I’ve ever been. I feel stronger than I ever have. My mobility is better than it ever has been. I feel more flexible and [I’m] sleeping fantastic.”
Stratman is not ready to start running again. Instead, he has adapted his routine with other forms of exercise, such as strength training and fast walking. He remains focused on long-term health.
For others facing similar decisions, both Stratman and Dr. Syed stress the importance of persistence, trust and informed care.
And for Dr. Syed, the ultimate goal is simple: meaningful improvement in patients’ lives.
More Healthcare Stories
minimally invasive spine surgery Central Illinois | endoscopic spine surgery for herniated disc | OSF HealthCare spine surgery Bloomington | back pain treatment without major surgery Illinois
Illustrious - Showcases and the stories behind Illinois’ most iconic high school gyms
CHICAGO - On a quiet Saturday afternoon in January 2012, at the Oak Park-River Forest field house, a simple thought refused to leave Vincent Johnson alone.
Covering a girls basketball game for the Oak Leaves, Johnson found himself looking beyond the box score and into the bones of the building itself. The space was overwhelming in the best way. Big. Empty. Striking. The field house - massive, architectural, overwhelming in character - was alive with echoes. The gym itself demanded his attention.
How good is your next steak? Look closely at the marbling
By Casey Cartwright
A premium steak makes an impression before it even reaches the grill. Fine streaks of fat run through the muscle, creating the visual pattern known as marbling. Those delicate flecks do much more than make a steak look appealing. They influence flavor and tenderness and affect how the beef performs over high heat.
Marbling plays a major role in the experience people expect from premium beef, but understanding it takes more than looking for the fattiest steak in the case. The amount and distribution of intramuscular ...
by Judith Ruiz-Branch
Alexandra Filindra, professor of political science and psychology at the university, said the numbers could be even higher because some officials worry reporting a threat makes the problem worse.
"Elected officials are reluctant to talk about what is happening to them because they're afraid that it will invite more political violence to their door," Filindra explained.
Filindra noted they may also be reluctant to support security measures or policies to address the violence because they think it could be seen as self-dealing rather than a legitimate response to safety risks. She added the intimidation is not necessarily politically motivated but there is a partisan divide in how people perceive the threats.
Her research showed nearly 80% of respondents view safety concerns raised by officials from their own party as legitimate, compared with about 30% for officials from the other party.
Filindra pointed to growing inequality, rising costs and reduced access to healthcare and other government services as factors leaving more people frustrated and in need, sometimes with local officials as their most accessible point of contact. She stressed they need to be hard on the problems, not the people.
"It is perfectly understandable that one gets angry at a decision and that a decision is not fair but threats and doxing and showing up at somebody's home and threatening their kids is not acceptable," Filindra emphasized.
With many local government positions having low pay or even being voluntary, she warned threats could make it harder to recruit people willing to serve in local or state government. In the Princeton report, 76% of surveyed officials said hostility concerns make them less willing to participate in at least one political or civic activity.
