Dominance Defined: Mirkovic’s Monster Double-Double Leads Illinois Past Colgate
Bloomington Central Catholic Saints: A Silver Finish That Shines Like Gold
by Alan LookBest Look Magazine
NORMAL - The Bloomington Central Catholic Saints closed out a remarkable season on the state’s biggest stage, earning a runner-up finish in the IHSA Class 2A Girls Volleyball Tournament. While the final result — a three-set loss to Columbia (25-19, 20-25, 17-25) in the championship match — may have stung in the moment, the team’s legacy is defined by the exceptional journey that led them to the state final floor in Normal.
Letter to the Editor |The Silent Killers of Marriage: Control, gossip, and the in-law problem
Dear Editor, In the present day, too many marriages are being strangled, not by the couple, but by the in-laws who just refuse to mind their own business. Yes! It’s not lack of love, not money, not differences between husband and wife. It’s interference. Constant, shameless, toxic interference from in-laws — especially from mothers-in-law and sisters-in-law who think they have the right to run the marriage like it’s their proxy war. Every day, mothers-in-law and sisters-in-law step into a marriage that does not belong to them, speaking ill of the wife, whispering poison into the husband’s ears, and trying to control decisions that are none of their concern in the first place. Let’s say it clearly: they are not part of the marriage. They are not the third, fourth, or fifth partner. They are outsiders to that matrimonial contract, yet they act as the hackers who have hijacked the couple’s shared operating system. Let’s get this straight with in-laws: you are not part of the couple. You are not the wife. You are not the husband. You are not the decision-maker. You are not the critic-in-chief or quality assurance agent for their love. Yet so many mothers and sisters act like they were appointed to control every detail — what the wife should wear, the neckline of her blouse, the volume of her voice, how the husband should behave, where the couple's autonomy is exercised, even the calendar for conceiving a child. This is all madness disguised as “family involvement.” In reality, it’s nothing but control, ego, and insecurity. The wife becomes a target of nonstop criticism, jealousy, and comparison. She is criticized for everything and anything: for speaking and for staying silent, for her opinions and for her clothes, for the food she makes and the air she breathes. These mothers and sisters poison the husband’s mind with their gossip, whispering, “She’s changed you,” “She’s controlling you,” “She’s taking you away from us.” And when he starts believing them, the marriage begins to bleed out and suffocate. Let’s tell the truth: a mother’s role ends where her son’s marriage begins. He has graduated from his mother’s tutorial to his wife’s partnership. And a sister’s opinion holds no weight in her brother’s private life. A wife is not your toy to criticize, nor your competition to hate. Against all falsehoods, stand this fact: one husband plus one wife equals a marriage. That’s it. No one else. The couple is grown, capable, and mature enough to make their own life decisions. They don’t need approval from anyone, not from a mother who wants to keep her son emotionally chained, not from sisters who think they have the right to interfere, and not from relatives who believe gossip is marital consultation or scholarly critique. This constant interference isn’t love…it’s psychological colonization and theft of privacy. Remember, a marriage doesn’t need a crowd. It needs boundaries, trust, and peace.
Karachi, Pakistan
More Editorial Viewpoints
Viewpoint |Trump defends rioters and controversial pardons amid backlash, the risk of silence
Guest Commentary
More Editorial Viewpoints
Guest Commentary |Is Congress hypocritical?
by Glenn Mollette, Guest Commentator
Glen Mollett is the author of 13 books including Uncommom Sense, the Spiritual Chocolate series, Grandpa's Store, Minister's Guidebook insights from a fellow minister. His column is published weekly in over 600 publications in all 50 states.
More Editorial Viewpoints
Guest Commentary |41.2 million Americans won't receive SNAP benefits, here is what they can do
by Glenn Mollette, Guest Commentator
- Fresh produce (fruits, vegetables, herbs)
- Meat, poultry, fish, and seafood
- Dairy products (milk, cheese, eggs)
- Breads and grains (bread, rice, pasta, cereals)
- Pantry items (canned goods, oils, spices)
- Snacks (nuts, seeds, dried fruit)
- Beverages (juice, milk, coffee, tea)
- Infant formula and baby food
- Seeds and plants to grow your own food
- Medicaid or CHIP (Children's Health Insurance Program)
- TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families)
- WIC (Women, Infants, and Children) program
- Free or reduced-price school meals
- Low-cost phone or internet service
- Housing assistance
- Energy assistance
- Veterans' benefits
- Summer EBT programs for children
- SNAP match programs at farmers' markets
- Discounts on museum or zoo visits
- November SNAP benefits will be delayed due to the shutdown, but a court has ruled they must be paid.
- Some states are providing emergency funds to help with the delay.
- SNAP recipients can still use their EBT cards and apply for benefits during the shutdown.
- Food banks are preparing for an increase in demand.
- Some businesses are offering discounted meals and other resources to help.
Glen Mollett is the author of 13 books including Uncommom Sense, the Spiritual Chocolate series, Grandpa's Store, Minister's Guidebook insights from a fellow minister. His column is published weekly in over 600 publications in all 50 states.
More Editorial Viewpoints
Viewpoint |Mamdani challenges U.S. on its promise of "never gain"
Guest Commentary
"What is happening in Gaza is genocide because the level and pace of indiscriminate killing, destruction, mass expulsions, displacement, famine, executions, the wiping out of cultural and religious institutions...and the sweeping dehumanization of the Palestinians — create an overall picture of genocide, of a deliberate conscious crushing of Palestinian existence in Gaza."
Other genocide scholars who have reached this conclusion include Martin Shaw, author of the book What is Genocide?; Melanie O'Brien, president of the International Association of Genocide Scholars; and Dirk Moses, senior editor of the Journal of Genocide Research.
The United Nations Genocide Convention placed prevention at the center of international law. By rejecting credible evidence of genocide, the U.S. is betraying its promise of "never again."
Guest Commentary |Everyday actions make a difference, treat people around you right
by Glenn Mollette, Guest Commentator
Open the door for people but stand and wait for someone to open one for you. Be the one who opens the door and encourage the person close by to go ahead of you. Pushing ahead of someone often prompts them to push forward and there is nothing gained by everyone trying to push forward ahead of the other, except ill will. Say thank you a lot and use kind words often. We all have the ability to complain and sometimes we have to complain or nothing gets done. When there is a big pot hole in your road then kindly ask the highway department to fix it. Try kindness, speaking respectfully and writing kind letters. Be very nice. You can always get ticked off and angry if there is no other alternative. However, usually there is higher road that we can take and in the end we will feel better if a positive result was met without having to act crazy. Do unto others as you would have them do unto you. This is a good Bible rule that works well in all aspects of life. Treat people the way you like be treated. If we, the American people, will do so, our country will run more smoothly, peacefully and happily.
Glen Mollett is the author of 13 books including Uncommom Sense, the Spiritual Chocolate series, Grandpa's Store, Minister's Guidebook insights from a fellow minister. His column is published weekly in over 600 publications in all 50 states.
These articles might also interest you:
- The Sentinel On This Day | October 21 - Articles from the Sentinel archives
- Tips for nailing your outdoor holiday décor this year
- Opinion | Declaring war on the American people, a government chomping at the bit
- Learning by leading: Building teen entrepreneurship and real-world business know-how
- Violent extremism’ the focus of new AG tip line; teacher faces license revocation
- Mass shootings, this has to be stopped
Letter to the Editor |The truth will never be outdated

Dear Editor, Illinois lawmakers have once again chosen left-wing ideology over integrity by embracing Governor J.B. Pritzker’s amendatory veto to the so-called Equality for Every Family Act, HB 2568. Despite its pleasant-sounding title, this legislation redefines what it means to be a mother, father, and family — not to promote equality, but to erase the natural and moral distinctions that God Himself ordained. The act deliberately severs parenthood from biology, marriage, and Judeo-Christian tradition. It treats children as commodities and family formation as a contractual arrangement, rather than a sacred trust grounded in the union of one man and one woman. By rewriting the Parentage and Gestational Surrogacy Acts, lawmakers have paved the way for state-sanctioned confusion — replacing natural law and parental responsibility with government-imposed definitions — new constructs — rooted in radical gender ideology. Children have a God-given inherent right — not merely a preference — to be known, loved, and raised by their biological mother and father whenever possible. This truth will never be outdated; it is foundational to human flourishing and social stability. By blurring those God-given roles, Illinois continues its descent into moral chaos, undermining both parental rights and the best interests of children. True equality is not achieved by denying reality or redefining the family. It is found in upholding truth, honoring motherhood and fatherhood, and protecting the vulnerable — especially children — from the experimental social agendas of adults.
David E. Smith, Executive Director
Illinois Family Institute
Got something you want to get off your chest? Send us your letter to the editor today. Here is how: Read this.
Related articles:
- Commentary | Unlikely bedfellows: How platform companies shortchange ride-share drivers and adult content creators alike
- America's rising "War on Culture" is becoming a factor in choosing the right college
- Sweeping up the homeless doesn't actually solve homelessness
- Researchers find African-Americans receive inequitable sentencing and remain over-represented in Illinois jails
Guest Commentary |We are all influencers, mentor by example
by Glenn Mollette, Guest Commentator
Your life may not make a national impact but who knows how far your life might reach? The people, friends, and family you influence today may have a tremendous impact on many others. You never know what an acquaintance or child might grow up to do or become because of you. The difference you are making now could become the integral key that helps someone to achieve their full potential in life.
When I was a kid, I had family, teachers, coaches and ministers who were influential. I also had James E. Webb. James is a first cousin, raised by my grandparents, who lived right across the road from me. He taught me how to play a mandolin a little. He taught me and another first cousin how to play the guitar some. James is a whiz bluegrass banjo picker who inspired us musically and helped us along the way. He spent time with us. He taught us guitar chords and how to put them together to make songs. James was Mr. Webb when he became one of my seventh and eighth grade teachers. He was a wonderful teacher and made history especially interesting. He was also our eighth-grade basketball coach. The main thing Mr. Webb did for us as a team was to get us into good physical condition. Many days our practice began with us running 45 minutes and sometimes an hour before we would pick up a basketball. We were skinny and we could run. About this same time, I didn’t have a basketball goal to practice on. Mr. Webb built one and put it up in his backyard so I would have a place to practice. Mr. Webb influenced his entire county as a school principal and musician. He made banjos and other quality handcrafted instruments that are scattered out and around Appalachia. There are a lot of other things James or Mr. Webb has done along the way. We have had a lot of talks about life. He is a good story teller. All of this was 50 years ago, or more. Even today, those little things seem like big things and they were. Don’t underestimate your influence and how you can mentor others every day.
Glen Mollett is the author of 13 books including Uncommom Sense, the Spiritual Chocolate series, Grandpa's Store, Minister's Guidebook insights from a fellow minister. His column is published weekly in over 600 publications in all 50 states.
These articles might also interest you:
Opinion |Declaring war on the American people, a government chomping at the bit
OtherWords
So the “punishing violence” that Hegseth demands is to be deployed against people here at home. More specifically, Trump said the military should use American cities as “training grounds,” saying, “That’s a war too. It’s a war from within.” Here’s what that war looked like in Chicago recently: federal agents rappelling from a Black Hawk helicopter onto an apartment building in the middle of the night, border patrol agents breaking into apartments and allegedly zip-tying young children (though DHS denies they were zip-tied), detaining American citizens, and leaving people’s apartments and belongings trashed. It wasn’t an isolated incident. The Washington Post reported that “U.S. citizens, immigrants with legal status, and children have been among those detained in increasingly brazen and aggressive encounters which pop up daily across neighborhoods in the city of 2.7 million and its many suburbs.” Trump’s war against “the enemy within” is grounded in lies.
The president and his colleagues have been falsely claiming that Portland, Oregon, is “war-ravaged” and “burning to the ground.” That claim was apparently based on a five-year-old video the president saw on Fox TV. Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden responded by posting a current video of people peacefully enjoying a beautiful fall day in Portland. The Trump team’s lying would be laughable if it weren’t propaganda with a deadly purpose. Fortunately, a federal judge — a Trump appointee — blocked Trump’s plans to federalize National Guard troops and send them into Portland, saying there are no conditions on the ground that could justify it. For defending the rule of law, the judge was savagely criticized by the White House. On top of all of this, Trump has repeatedly violated the foundational military tradition of nonpartisanship. Speaking to cadets at a recent event honoring the Navy’s 250th anniversary, Trump declared, “We have to take care of this little gnat that’s on our shoulder called the Democrats.” As one commenter noted, Trump basically told the Navy to view half of the country as the enemy. That’s dangerous. And it’s un-American. People sometimes interpret Trump’s unhinged rhetoric as a strategy to distract people from other stories. It’s worse than that. I’m sure the president would like people to ignore that he shut down the federal government to preserve tax cuts for the richest 1 percent while forcing millions of families to face huge increases for health insurance or lose their coverage completely. But Trump’s “enemy within” is more than a distraction. It is even more than a violent threat against millions of our fellow Americans. It’s promotion for a war the president is already waging — one that’s been denounced by retired generals and veterans. The unjustifiable deployment of the military against American citizens is a frightening abuse of power that should alarm Republicans and independents as well as Democrats. The Constitution can protect all of us only if we defend the Constitution.
Peter Montgomery is a Senior Fellow at People for the American Way. This op-ed was distributed by OtherWords.org.
Viewpoint |Mental health, gender care, and justice: The debate around Sophie Roske’s prison term
Guest Commentary
Yet by their standards, the scores of January 6 rioters who breached the Capitol while chanting "Hang Mike Pence!" should also have been sentenced to at least 30 years in prison. After all, they are domestic terrorists who attempted to execute the Vice President. Instead, they have all been pardoned by President Trump.
Appallingly, in an interview with Jonathan Karl of ABC News, Trump actually defended the January 6 rioters' "Hang Mike Pence!" chants.
How can anyone claim to oppose political violence while supporting a person who pardoned January 6 rioters who assaulted police officers and publicly defended their violent chants?
Guest Commentary |AI in daily life: Intimacy, disruption, and what it means for humanity
Guest Commentary
AI stands in a similar place today. The difference is that this time the machine isn’t confined to a factory or lab. It is intimate, personal, pervasive — helping your child with homework, curating your playlist, reminding you to drink water — and possibly selling those data points to someone you’ve never met. It follows our movements, records our preferences, and learns our habits until it can predict them with disquieting accuracy. We call this “personalization,” but it is really a mirror showing how predictable we’ve become. Free will, so cherished as a human ideal, begins to resemble a carefully staged performance in which the lines are gently suggested by algorithms. The printing press gave control of ideas to the many; AI could reverse that, shifting influence back to those who design the systems. If free will was ever a pristine thing, algorithms now have smudged the glass. Nietzsche declared “God is dead,” and humanity took his place. Now our own creations, “powered by code instead of commandments,” test how it feels to dethrone us. Its impact on education shows its paradox. Teachers admit that essays, lab reports, and even poetry assignments arrive in prose too polished for a sleep-deprived teenager. The deeper question isn’t cheating; it’s the gradual outsourcing of thought. If a machine can generate a flawless answer in seconds, what exactly is the student supposed to learn? Einstein once argued that education should be about ideas, not just facts. In the AI age, that principle is urgent: machines will always store and retrieve better than we can; what they cannot do is cultivate judgment, empathy, and context. Those are the skills education must protect.
Half-literacy in the digital age is more dangerous than illiteracy ever was. A person who can read but cannot discern misinformation, or who can navigate a device but cannot question its intent, is more vulnerable than one who lacks access. As AI advances, truth and fabrication will blur with greater sophistication. The challenge will not be finding answers but knowing which questions are worth asking. What makes AI’s rise feel different from earlier technological revolutions is its intimacy. We don’t just use it; we confide in it. Chatbots have become companions to the lonely, brainstorming partners to the overworked, and sometimes more rewarding than speaking to another human. The machine never interrupts or takes offense. But comfort has a price. Time saved is rarely spent on rest or reflection; it is reinvested into more screen time, dependence, and anxiety about being left behind. Meanwhile, tech companies frame this as empowerment — “democratizing knowledge,” “upskilling communities,” “bridging the digital divide.” Sometimes these initiatives are genuine, other times akin to the colonial “free railways” — convenient for the empire, less so for the colonized. The danger isn’t only in surveillance or job loss. It is in the erosion of inefficiencies that make us human. Progress is messy, contradictory, full of detours. A society optimized to perfection may function better, but it would lose the unpredictability that sparks art, discovery, and change. We now see the appetite for ranking people with algorithmic “merit scores” — a digital caste system where privilege and productivity are weighed and tagged. The Gold Class gets the plum opportunities; the Bronze Class is told it’s still “included” while quietly excluded from anything that matters. Technology, we’re told, is the great equalizer. In practice, it magnifies the inequalities it claims to erase. Facebook’s “Free Basics,” meant to connect the unconnected, was accused of enabling propaganda and deepening divides. AI could do the same — faster, more precisely, and harder to catch in the act.
Yet to see AI only as a threat is to miss its potential. Like the printing press, it is a tool, not a destiny. Used with transparency, accountability, and imagination, it could extend education to the remotest villages, deliver healthcare to those without doctors, and give voice to silenced communities. Left entirely to the pursuit of profit, it will entrench the disparities it claims to solve. The real question is whether we can cultivate the wisdom to steer it. That means regulation as ambitious as the technology, public literacy campaigns beyond “how to use” guides, and the humility to admit that not every problem needs a machine-learning solution. Human history is a long conversation with our inventions. At first, they astonish us. Then we adapt. Eventually, we forget who began the conversation, and the creation becomes background, like wallpaper we no longer notice. The printing press, steam engine, light bulb — each began as a wonder and ended as something ordinary. AI will follow the same arc unless we choose otherwise. What feels extraordinary today will be mundane tomorrow, but in this brief in-between moment, we still have the chance to decide the terms of our partnership with it. The future is shaped not only in public breakthroughs but in what we accept, automate, and what we stop questioning. If we surrender those choices to the machine, it will not need our consent. It will keep speaking long after we have stopped listening.
Viewpoint |Single moms and the child care crisis in the U.S.
by Brea HarrisOtherWords
At three months old, my son was kicked out of his daycare.
I had spent my pregnancy navigating my city’s brutal child care landscape — posting on social media looking for nanny shares, adding my name to year-long waitlists, and wondering how I was going to pay the astronomical daycare fees.
So when I found this place, I felt a flood of relief. It was close to my job, half the cost of others in the area, and had a gold star recommendation from a friend of a friend. It seemed like a unicorn amidst daycares. It seemed like the perfect fit.
Yet less than a week after I returned to work, I received a call asking me to pick up my son because he was crying too much. The next day, same call. After a few days I was told “it was not a good fit.” I had until the end of the month.
I had exhausted my PTO and depleted my savings in an attempt to offset the costs of my unpaid leave. I don’t have family nearby. I’m a single mom working in healthcare unable to work remotely or stay home full time. And I had no idea where I was going to send my three month old son during the day while I worked.
I sent out desperate pleas to mom groups in my area and eventually, through the power of the moms in my community, I found the daycare he now attends.
I love this daycare. However, it costs more than my rent — it puts a $1,600 deficit in my monthly budget. So with each passing month I fall further behind on car payments, student loans, utilities. And every day I field calls from debt collectors.
All of this is due to the cost of child care.
When I started sharing my story with friends, coworkers, and random moms on the playground, I quickly learned that I’m not alone. Almost every mom I know has a story like this. They’ve been juggling budget deficits to afford care, pleading for financial aid, adding their names to yearlong wait lists, reducing their work hours, or cutting their careers short.
The details vary, but the common thread is this: Child care costs are unsustainable.
One night, up late with a teething baby, I fell down a Google rabbit hole, reading about countries with policies that truly support moms and families. Sweden offers 16 months of paid parental leave. Norway provides leave specifically for parents caring for a sick child. Canada is initiating $10 a day child care. Portugal has free child care for all regardless of income.
This late night rabbit hole affirmed what I already knew in my gut: moms in the U.S. are struggling due to systemic issues and policy failures. And it does not have to be this way.
In my 13 months of motherhood, I’ve already witnessed the power moms have when we band together. It was moms that helped me secure a last minute daycare spot. It was moms who recently gathered at a local park to swap baby gear in response to rising prices.
And it will be moms who demand more from our policymakers when it comes to the accessibility of child care in our country.
More stories ~
Editor's Choice
From Doorbusters to Discounts: Shoppers turn Black Friday into a strategic savings season
Once a one-day shopping event, Black Friday has evolved into a month-long season of rolling discounts and online deals...