This hyperconnectivity has profound psychological implications. From an operational standpoint, informal and unregulated communication channels present structural inefficiencies.
by Nabajyoti Narzary
Guest Commentary
Guest Commentary
Photo: StockSnap/Pixabay
Employees today are frequently integrated into multiple digital groups, ranging from routine administrative updates to emergency response coordination. The volume and frequency of communication—often outside standard working hours—create a digital tether. What was once considered personal time is now frequently invaded by a stream of requests, reminders, and follow-ups. Unlike traditional communication tools such as memos or scheduled emails, real-time platforms simulate an "always-on duty" culture, implicitly demanding prompt responses regardless of the context.
From an operational standpoint, informal and unregulated communication channels present structural inefficiencies.
This hyperconnectivity has profound psychological implications. The inability to detach from work-related communications intrudes on mental space, affecting emotional well-being and leading to symptoms of burnout. Employees may experience persistent anxiety, irritability, and even sleep disorders. The stress caused by this round-the-clock expectation chips away at personal relationships, physical health, and the time needed for introspection and rejuvenation. Younger professionals, especially those early in their careers, are disproportionately affected. In an attempt to prove diligence and reliability, many adopt an overly responsive approach, answering late-night messages or reacting to non-urgent communications during personal moments. This leads to heightened anxiety, as the line between dedication and overextension becomes dangerously blurred. Rather than being a tool for empowerment, communication technology becomes a mechanism for silent coercion. From an operational standpoint, informal and unregulated communication channels present structural inefficiencies. Unlike traditional office systems that ensured accountability and order—through file tracking, documented instructions, and formalized hierarchies—instant messaging platforms lack structured workflows. Communication is often fragmented, imprecise, and susceptible to misinterpretation. Critical tasks can become obscured by trivial updates, resulting in oversight and duplication of effort.
Other Stories ~
Why India’s youth must step into politics: Breaking barriers and building the future
Global Zionist citizenship, an updated anifesto
State Representative says Illinois needs to focus on its citizens
American holiday efficiency, a three-for-one on June 14
Affordable storage ideas for small apartments, clever hacks to make more space
Moreover, the absence of features like digital signatures, formal timestamping, and archival functionality poses significant challenges in authenticating instructions or referring back to communication trails. In environments where compliance and auditability are crucial, such informal exchanges fall short. What begins as a tool for convenience often morphs into a source of administrative confusion and inefficiency.
The overreliance on informal digital communication also deteriorates professional decorum. The casual tone often adopted in such platforms undermines the seriousness of official discourse. Important matters may be conveyed in fragmented or unclear messages, leading to misalignment and errors in execution. The erosion of formality in communication affects organizational discipline, creating a culture where urgency and clarity are constantly compromised.
There is a pressing need for a cultural and systemic shift in how organizations approach communication.
The broader implication is a workplace culture drifting toward toxicity. When employees feel scrutinized for their responsiveness or judged by their online visibility, a competitive and anxious atmosphere emerges. Surveillance replaces trust, and performance anxiety replaces teamwork. The result is a fragmented workforce where genuine productivity takes a back seat to the mere performance of connectivity. This phenomenon cannot be resolved through technological intervention alone. There is a pressing need for a cultural and systemic shift in how organizations approach communication. Organizations must promote respect for individual time and distinguish between routine and urgent communications. Communication protocols should be standardized and aligned with realistic expectations. A potential alternative is the development and adoption of dedicated platforms designed to cater to professional needs—systems that incorporate both the agility of instant messaging and the structure of formal communication. These platforms should enable features such as categorizing messages by priority, setting communication windows, archiving conversations systematically, and ensuring data security through encrypted and government-controlled servers where applicable. In addition, leadership behavior plays a critical role. Managers and senior officials should set an example of responsible digital behavior by refraining from after-hours messaging unless absolutely required. This not only establishes a standard but also signals that the organization values the well-being of its employees. Establishing formal policies that define communication boundaries is vital in reinforcing these values.
The challenge lies in ensuring that technology serves us, not consumes us.
Training programs can also be instrumental. Sessions on digital etiquette, managing notifications, and setting boundaries can empower employees to engage more mindfully. Emphasis should be placed on time management, prioritization, and mental wellness. Organizations must actively cultivate an environment where boundaries are respected and employees feel secure in disconnecting without fear of judgment or professional disadvantage. Furthermore, promoting trust-based work cultures over output surveillance will help dismantle the toxicity emerging from hyperconnectivity. By encouraging outcome-based evaluation rather than input visibility, organizations can allow professionals to work with autonomy and dignity. That said, it is important to acknowledge that this very connectivity has brought significant advantages, particularly in sectors where rapid response and real-time coordination are critical. For emergency workers, disaster response teams, healthcare professionals, district administration, and law enforcement agencies, the ability to remain connected at all times has often meant the difference between life and death. Real-time surveillance, instant data sharing, and continuous communication have enhanced situational awareness, streamlined coordination, and accelerated decision-making in high-stakes scenarios. In such contexts, the digital tether becomes an enabler, not a burden—ensuring that help is never too far away and that collective action can be mobilized swiftly in times of need. Therefore, the modern workplace must recognize that digital connectivity is a double-edged sword. When harnessed wisely, it can effectively drive efficiency and collaboration. However, when left unchecked, it can lead to overwhelming pressure and a decline in quality of life. The challenge lies in ensuring that technology serves us, not consumes us.
Nabajyoti Narzary works in administration, where he explore the intersection of people and institutional systems at the grassroots level, uncovering untold stories of governance and everyday resilience. Writing is his sanctuary, flowing from daily observations and reflective moments, often captured in a personal diary and complemented by long evening walks with their dog, Nia. A college trip to Serbia sparked a lasting interest in Eastern European culture and history, inspiring a deep appreciation for the region’s complex tapestry shaped by centuries of conflict, coexistence, and cultural evolution.
