Letter to the Editor |
Public officials should stop using hate rhetoric


Writer implores politicians to treat Muslims Americans with the respect and dignity they deserve.


Dear Editor,

Muslim Americans are our neighbors, coworkers and fellow citizens. They are entitled to the same full place in our national community as every other American.

Yet Rep. Derrick Van Orden (R-WI) has said that Islam “does not comport with modern Western thought” and that, when practiced as written, it is “a violent religion.”

That rhetoric is not isolated. Rep. Nancy Mace (R-SC) wrote on X that “Every single Muslim holding public office in America is a trojan horse and a threat to national security and the republic." Rep. Andy Ogles (R-TN) likewise posted that “Muslims don’t belong in American society.”

These statements do more than criticize particular ideas or policies. They portray an entire religious community—including families, students and public servants—as inherently suspect and outside the national “we.” That is precisely the danger Holocaust survivor Herbert C. Kelman warned against in his essay, “Dignity and Dehumanization.”

Kelman wrote: “The central lesson that I have learned from the Holocaust is that we must never allow any people, any human group, to be excluded from our moral community.” For Kelman, a moral community is one in which people recognize obligations to one another.

Public officials should reject language that casts millions of Americans as threats because of their faith and instead affirm the equal dignity and safety of Muslim Americans.


Terry Hansen
Grafton, WI


Terry Hansen is a retired educator from Grafton, WI, who writes frequently about climate change and on human rights. He lives in Grafton, WIsconsin.



Guest Commentary |
Trump dividend promise is a terrible ideal


He would vote for Trump a third time. However, Glenn Mollette thinks President Trump's $5,000 dividend promise is a terrible ideal.


by Glenn Mollette
Guest Columnist


Glenn Mollette
Most Americans could use an extra $5,000. President Trump is dangling that amount to Americans if Republicans are able to maintain control of the House and Senate. The estimated cost of such a payout would be over $1 trillion. Our President is calling it a dividend.

I voted for our President twice. I would vote for him again, but this is a terrible idea. He has to know it’s a terrible idea but I am sure he thinks another trillion dollars in debt is the lesser of two evils.

The other evil would be if the Democrats regain control of either the House or the Senate and especially both they would immediately impeach President Trump. Illegal immigrants would flood into our country and who know how the Iran war would end. I can’t blame him for doing whatever it takes to hold on, but this is too much.

Our nation is already in danger of financial collapse. Are we going to file bankruptcy or just print more. Who will suffer? We all will suffer.

Social Security recipients will be the first to feel the impact. We are already in danger of having our funds reduced by 2034. This could come sooner due to our crippling debt. There will be no let up on student loans.

Young adults are crippled for life by college debt that many spend most of their lives repaying. These interest rates vary from 6.52% to 9.07% depending on if you are an undergraduate, graduate or parent. There will not be any tax cuts. A $40 trillion debt will only result in the need for more taxes and not less.

You will owe tax on the $5,000 and it might put you into another tax bracket which will make your tax burden greater. The more you owe the government in April could end up erasing the $5,000 dividend.

Joe Biden did a stupid thing when he sent out $1,400 to most Americans as part of the American Rescue Plan, which cost $414 billion, only a part of 1.9 trillion Covid-19 relief bill. Biden sent our billions to businesses and colleges that they didn’t have to pay back. That’s in the past but the debt is very present.

Promising all of us a $5,000 dividend is dangling a carrot in the front of the eyes of millions of Americans who are financially struggling. That money would but some groceries or maybe payoff a credit card or a car. Most Americans are not in the position to turn down such an offer.

Is buying votes illegal? Every politician makes promises of big returns if elected.

If such an event takes place it won’t be until after the first of the year, and only if the Republicans win. Time will tell. Promises have been made by politicians before that did not come to fruition.

All the while, gasoline is outrageous, groceries are sky high and the rising cost of the war in Iran is over $30 billion while some estimate the cost to be nearing $50 billion. Who will pay this $40 trillion debt? You, your children, your grandchildren and so on.


About the author ~

Glen Mollett is the author of 13 books including Uncommom Sense, the Spiritual Chocolate series, Grandpa's Store, Minister's Guidebook insights from a fellow minister. His column is published weekly in over 600 publications in all 50 states.




Tags:

Viewpoint |
Socialism or dividend? It all depends on who is saying it


The $5,000 promise - Washington still has to pay the bill. It isn't the free lunch they want you to believe it is.


by Van Abbott
Guest Contributor


A $5,000 check from Washington is either socialism or a dividend, depending on which party is signing it.

On Sept. 1, the House passed a Republican resolution condemning “socialism in all its forms” by a vote of 220-192. Days later, at the Republican National Committee's midterm convention in Dallas, President Trump warned that Democratic socialism would lead to communism, then promised every adult American a $5,000 “dividend” if Republicans hold Congress.

When Democrats propose sending government money to Americans, Republicans call it socialism.

When Republicans propose the same thing, they call it a dividend.

That contradiction points to a more useful question than either label: how does Washington keep promising new money when the national debt has already passed $40 trillion?

Trump's proposal would cost more than $1.2 trillion if paid to every adult citizen. He has offered no detailed financing plan, pointing instead to economic strength and tariff revenue, while Commerce Secretary Lutnick has floated other sources. Whatever it's called, a $5,000 payment funded by the federal government is federal spending.

The timing makes the contradiction harder to ignore. The national debt sits at $40 trillion, annual deficits already run in the trillions, and Washington keeps finding new ways to add to both. The White House ballroom renovation has climbed to an estimated $927 million, much of it taxpayer-funded, according to The Washington Post. A proposed $1.776 billion “Anti-Weaponization Fund” would compensate people, including convicted Jan. 6 defendants, who claim they were unfairly targeted; a federal court blocked it in July, and the DOJ is appealing. And, Construction is set to begin on a 250-foot Independence Arch.

A $40 trillion debt is not an abstraction. It is a mortgage on our children's future, one likely to leave them with a lower standard of living than their parents had.

A prolonged war with Iran would only add to that risk. The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan cost taxpayers several trillion dollars over two decades, according to a Brown University study; a drawn-out conflict with Iran could add substantially to a debt already out of control.

Each of these commitments can be defended on its own terms. The real question is what they add up to on top of the $40 trillion already owed.

That is where the socialism and communism argument collapses. Republicans call Democratic proposals for health care, child care and family benefits socialism, yet Republican administrations use the same government power for their own priorities: a 9.9 percent stake in Intel, a “golden share” in U.S. Steel, tariff-funded aid to farmers, and now a $5,000 check to every household. Each moves money from the public treasury to a recipient chosen by whichever party controls it at the time, which is the same transfer Republicans call socialism when Democrats propose universal health care.

None of this makes America socialist or communist. Those are specific terms with long, consequential histories, not political weapons to fire whenever an opponent's policy needs discrediting. Calling something socialism or communism doesn't make it so; it substitutes an accusation for an argument. If government intervention is acceptable when Republicans choose the industry or the recipient, the debate was never about ideology. It was about whether a policy is necessary, affordable and worth the cost.

Affordability should be the easiest question to answer. If tariffs are paying for the check, why should Americans face higher prices so Washington can hand some of the money back? If borrowing is paying for it, why add another trillion dollars to the $40 trillion already owed? If a settlement fund is paying for it, why should taxpayers cover claims from people convicted of attacking Congress? If deficits already run in the trillions every year, why does one more trillion get called a dividend instead of debt?

Voters shouldn't have to choose between socialism and communism. Those aren't policy arguments; they're campaign weapons. They should be able to ask something simpler: what will it cost, who will pay for it, and what will America get in return?

The $5,000 promise makes those questions impossible to avoid. Republicans can call it a dividend, call Democratic programs socialism, and call their opponents communists. Washington still has to pay the bill.

With $40 trillion already on the national credit card, the question isn't whether Washington calls the next check socialism or a dividend. It's who will finally stop signing for money America doesn't have.


About the author ~
Van Abbott is a long time resident of Alaska and California. He has held financial management positions in government and private organizations in California, Kansas, and Alaska. He is retired and writes Op-Eds as a hobby. He served in the Peace Corps in the late sixties. You can find more of his commentaries and comments on life in America on Substack.




TAGS: Trump promises money if Republicans win, It is only socialism when the Left does it, War in Iran costs Americans trillions, upcoming election promise, Congress still must approve the distribution, Another empty Trump promise, political commentary by Van Abbott


What do you think?
Whether you agree, disagree, or want to build on the ideas in this piece, we’d love to hear your voice. If you have an opinion you’d like to share — on this topic or any other — you can find our submission guidelines here: Sentinel submission guideline.

We welcome a wide range of viewpoints and would be glad to consider your perspective for publication on OurSentinel.com. Send your letter or commentary to editor@oursentinel.com and help keep the community conversation moving forward.


Viewpoint |
Dolly Parton’s legacy is full of compassion, not cruelty


Dolly Parton’s legacy extends far beyond music and movies. Melissa Dimondstein argues that Parton’s generosity, compassion and commitment to inclusion stand in sharp contrast to the politics and policies of President Donald Trump.

Photo: Matt Benson/Unsplash

by Melissa Dimondstein
OtherWords


I’ve been a fan of Dolly Parton since her terrific 1980 movie (and hit song) 9-5, on the struggle of working women organizing for dignity and respect — and against sexual harassment. Along with millions of others, I’m saddened by the Queen of Country’s passing.

But I’m miffed about people who opposed what Dolly stood for now trying to claim her legacy as their own.

For instance, President Trump has claimed that Parton was a supporter of his, even sharing a fake AI photo of the two of them together. Dolly’s sister Stella set the record straight, calling Trump’s behavior “deranged, ugly, and nasty.”

In life Dolly Parton was the opposite of Donald Trump. She was compassionate, humble, generous, humorous (including poking fun at herself), and accepting of people from all walks of life.


Dolly Parton donated millions to medical research, including to children’s hospitals, cancer research, and the COVID vaccine.

Dolly Parton turned down the presidential medal of freedom three times, saying she didn’t deserve it. Trump brags of his own self-importance, flies giant self-portraits from federal buildings, places his picture in passports, demands the Nobel peace prize, renamed the Kennedy Center after himself, and declares he is a genius.

As a tribute to her hard-working sharecropping father who never had the opportunity to learn to read, Dolly Parton created and funded the Imagination Library, providing hundreds of millions of books to young children — my grandchildren included. President Trump, who never lacked financial opportunity, is now pushing to slash funding for education, libraries, and literacy.

Dolly Parton embraced Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI.) She was supportive of the LGBTQ community, expressed support for Black Lives Matter, and uplifted those with disabilities. Trump has attacked DEI as “woke” and un-American, ridiculed the trans community, mocked people with disabilities, and labeled Black Lives Matter protesters as domestic terrorists.

Dolly Parton appeared with PBS’s Sesame Street characters to promote values of inclusivity and equality among children. Trump defunded PBS and Sesame Street, declaring them “radical left monsters.”


I don’t have to agree with everything Dolly Parton did or didn’t do over the decades ...

Dolly Parton celebrated women workers and was a proud union member for over 60 years. Trump crushed the union rights of over 1 million federal workers, paid millions in a lawsuit for sexual abuse, and carries on with the massive cover-up of Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking.

Dolly Parton donated millions to medical research, including to children’s hospitals, cancer research, and the COVID vaccine. Trump threatens the existence of rural hospitals with cuts to Medicaid, slashed federal funding for medical research, and eliminated the agency overseeing patient safety.

Dolly Parton donated substantial relief funds to those in her Tennessee Appalachian region whose property and lives were shattered by natural disasters. The Trump administration has undermined, delayed, and politicized disaster relief.

Dolly Parton had empathy toward the homeless and was known to give the “shawl off her back” to those in need. Donald Trump criminalizes the homeless and sent thousands of National Guard troops to rid D.C. of its homeless population.

Dolly Parton empathized with the plight of migrant workers. She loved John Steinbeck’s famous book The Grapes of Wrath and covered Woody Guthrie’s song “Deportee.” Trump demonizes hardworking immigrants as rapists and criminals and has unleashed an army of violent masked ICE agents to terrorize our neighbors and communities.

I don’t have to agree with everything Dolly Parton did or didn’t do over the decades to recognize that she was a generous soul. She never forgot where she came from and acted on her religious beliefs of “Love your Neighbor” and “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” Donald Trump hoards his riches and uses the power of the presidency to enrich himself, his family, and oligarch cronies to the tune of billions.

The best way to honor Dolly Parton’s legacy is to counter Trump’s cruel inhumanity with generosity, kindness, compassion, respect, and unity. And while we are celebrating her life, sit back with family and friends (as I have done) and watch, or rewatch, 9-5. You will laugh, cry, and applaud!


Melissa Dimondstein is a retired postal worker, a community leader and former activist in the American Postal Workers Union, and a proud grandmother of three. This op-ed was distributed by OtherWords.org.





What do you think?
Whether you agree, disagree, or want to build on the ideas in this piece, we’d love to hear your voice. If you have an opinion you’d like to share — on this topic or any other — you can find our submission guidelines here: Sentinel submission guideline.

We welcome a wide range of viewpoints and would be glad to consider your perspective for publication on OurSentinel.com. . Send your letter or commentary to editor@oursentinel.com and help keep the community conversation moving forward.

TAGS: Dolly Parton legacy and Donald Trump, Melissa Dimondstein Dolly Parton opinion, Dolly Parton compassion generosity and inclusion, Dolly Parton Imagination Library legacy, Dolly Parton 9-5 working women legacy

Viewpoint |
When faith becomes ammunition: The danger of sanctifying war


Religious faith can guide people through the horrors of war, but government power must remain accountable to law, evidence and constitutional limits.


by Van Abbott
Guest Contributor


First the boat was destroyed, then two survivors were killed in a second strike, and now the men directing America’s wars want us to see such violence through the eyes of God.

On Sept. 2, 2025, a U.S. strike destroyed a suspected drug-trafficking boat in the Caribbean. Two men survived and clung to the wreckage. A second strike killed them.

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth later defended the operation, invoking the “fog of war” and saying the admiral who ordered the second strike had the authority to do so.

The incident was not isolated.

Trump’s maritime campaign has killed more than 223 people and destroyed 67 vessels as of 08/30/2026. The administration says those targeted are drug traffickers or narco-terrorists. But Americans have received too little evidence about who was killed.


The problem begins when faith becomes ammunition.

More than 223 dead. More than 67 boats destroyed. Still too few answers.

Then came Hegseth’s prayer.

At a Pentagon Christian worship service, the defense secretary prayed for “overwhelming violence” against people he said “deserve no mercy” and asked that “every round find its mark against the enemies of righteousness and our great nation.”

Trump identifies the targets. Hegseth sanctifies the violence.

Trump has supplied his own religious vocabulary. He called the rescue of a downed American airman in Iran an “Easter Miracle.” In threatening Iran, he warned that “all Hell” would rain down and concluded, “Glory be to GOD.”

There is nothing wrong with a president praying for soldiers. There is nothing wrong with a defense secretary expressing faith. There is nothing wrong with thanking God when an American service member comes home alive.

The problem begins when faith becomes ammunition.

When military violence is presented as divine favor, when enemies become people who “deserve no mercy,” when destruction is wrapped in righteousness, religious language no longer merely accompanies government power. It begins to sanctify it.


...because war already gives human beings extraordinary power over life and death.

That should alarm Christians, Jews, Muslims, atheists and every American who believes the Constitution, not theology, governs the use of military force.

And the danger may not stop at the Pentagon.

The Military Religious Freedom Foundation has reported receiving more than 200 complaints concerning religious comments by military commanders about the Iran war. One complaint alleged that a commander told troops the conflict was part of God’s plan, that Trump had been “anointed by Jesus.”

Those allegations remain allegations. They should be independently investigated, not casually repeated as fact.

But the allegation itself illustrates the danger.

A soldier’s oath is to the Constitution. An officer’s duty is to lawful authority. A commander may pray with troops, but personal theology cannot become a military command structure.

The American military exists to defend the nation, not to stage-manage prophecy.

That distinction matters because war already gives human beings extraordinary power over life and death. A president’s authority to use military force does not include the authority to redefine killing as righteousness.

Faith should strengthen those limits, not erase them.

It should remind those who command force to distinguish combatants from civilians, use no more force than necessary, protect the wounded, accept surrender and seek peace when war has accomplished its legitimate purpose.

Mercy does not mean surrendering to an enemy. It means recognizing that even war has rules.

The Good Samaritan did not first ask whether the wounded man belonged to his tribe, shared his beliefs or deserved help. He saw a human being in the road and stopped.

The Good Samaritan ran toward the wounded.

A double tap makes the wounded the next target.

Iran’s regime is brutal. Drug cartels are brutal. Neither fact gives the United States permission to abandon law, evidence or restraint. America can destroy legitimate military targets without declaring every enemy beyond mercy. It can fight terrorism without turning war into theology. It can defend itself without claiming God as a member of the chain of command.

Congress should demand the evidence from the boat campaign: the strike video, the orders, the legal memoranda and the complete casualty record.

Congress should also investigate reports of religious coercion or apocalyptic messaging inside military commands and make clear that American service members must never be pressured to confuse obedience to lawful orders with obedience to a commander’s private theology.

The Constitution gives government enormous power to wage war. It does not give government the power to declare its violence holy.

The Good Samaritan ran toward the wounded. America should remember that before the next target is declared righteous to kill.


About the author ~
Van Abbott is a long time resident of Alaska and California. He has held financial management positions in government and private organizations in California, Kansas, and Alaska. He is retired and writes Op-Eds as a hobby. He served in the Peace Corps in the late sixties. You can find more of his commentaries and comments on life in America on Substack.




TAGS: religious language and military violence in America, Pentagon faith and constitutional limits on war, Pete Hegseth religious comments and military force, Good Samaritan lesson for American military policy, Constitutional limits on religious justification for war


What do you think?
Whether you agree, disagree, or want to build on the ideas in this piece, we’d love to hear your voice. If you have an opinion you’d like to share — on this topic or any other — you can find our submission guidelines here: Sentinel submission guideline.

We welcome a wide range of viewpoints and would be glad to consider your perspective for publication on OurSentinel.com. Send your letter or commentary to editor@oursentinel.com and help keep the community conversation moving forward.


Guest Commentary |
Dolly Parton’s legacy goes far beyond her music


Guest Commentator Glenn Mollette remembers Dolly Parton through the music, performances and humanitarian work that made her one of the most recognizable and beloved figures in American entertainment.


by Glenn Mollette
Guest Columnist


Glenn Mollette
I was in the third grade when my teacher announced that President Kennedy had been shot. I was in the parking lot of an auto parts store in Englewood, Ohio when I heard on the radio that Elvis had died. I will always remember where I was when I learned the sad news that Dolly Parton had died.

The first time I saw Dolly was on The Porter Wagoner Show. For a long time, Wagoner’s female guest artist was Norma Jean. He always introduced her as “the pretty miss Norma Jean”. Then, one Saturday night there was a new guest singer. It was Dolly. Dolly was a young rising star who caught the attention of Wagoner. He knew she was an awesome talent.

The parting song that she wrote for Wagoner became a major hit. “I Will Always Love You” was a phenomenal hit for Parton but then became a mega hit when it was sung by Whitney Houston in the 1992 movie The Bodyguard. Houston’s version of the song has sold over 24 million copies worldwide and has over 800 million downloads on Spotify.

Dolly made an indelible impression on all of us. Anyone who ever heard her sing or watched her in a movie was touched by the person of Dolly. She wrote great songs. She was an amazing singer and fabulous actress. She was a smart business person. Her success brought her more and more successes.

There is nothing that any writer or television/radio person can add to Dolly. All we can do is grieve and embrace all she gave us, which was a lot. She had 25 hits on Billboard’s Hot Country Song chart. She had many other popular songs like “9 to 5” and “Islands in the Stream”. She made at least 23 movies including 9 to 5, The Best Little Whorehouse in Texas, Steel Magnolias and Joyful Noise. She won eleven Grammys out of 55 nominations. She had many business adventures including Dollywood, a theme park in Sevierville, Tennessee. She owned Dolly Wines, a line of cake mixes with Duncan Hines, a pet accessories line called Doggy Parton and a plethora of fragrances. She had apparel and beauty products and Dolly’s Tennessean Travel Stop. Recently, she was working on building a hotel in Nashville called Song Teller Hotel.

Her net worth has been estimated to be between $450 to $650 million.

We loved Dolly for a lot of reasons. She was a real person. The plastic surgery and her super success never tarnished her ability to connect with people on all levels. Her Imaginations Library project has gifted millions of books to children. Her financial support of hospitals and medical research was also in the millions. She supported multiple humanitarian causes which helped and encouraged so many.

I saw her in the Ryman Auditorium just a few years back. She was doing an acoustic performance with no bells or whistles and only a small ensemble of musicians. It was a simple show to raise money for struggling Nashville musicians. My wife and I were able to buy seats in the balcony and then sat for a mesmerizing two-hour show of Dolly just giving us her best in song and performance. I believe that’s how she lived her daily life and that’s one of many reasons why we will always love her.


About the author ~

Glen Mollett is the author of 13 books including Uncommom Sense, the Spiritual Chocolate series, Grandpa's Store, Minister's Guidebook insights from a fellow minister. His column is published weekly in over 600 publications in all 50 states.




Tags: Dolly Parton, Glenn Mollette, Guest Commentator, music, country music, entertainment, philanthropy, Dolly Parton legacy, The Porter Wagoner Show, Ryman Auditorium

Guest commentary |
Life lessons from the buffet, the highway and everyday kindness


Glenn Mollette offers a series of simple strategies for navigating life's highway, from slowing down and letting others pass to showing appreciation and treating people with kindness.


by Glenn Mollette
Guest Columnist


Glenn Mollette
We all need a few strategies for navigating the highway of life.

Here is a simple rule. Don’t fight with people at a buffet. When someone breaks in front of you to grab for the fried chicken or mashed potatoes then simply back off. Let them reach for what they want. Keep in mind it’s a buffet and more food will be coming. We’ve all seen people act like they have not eaten in years when they are going through a buffet. Take your time. You can always come back to the buffet for more. You won’t go home hungry.

Let people pass you on the road. If you want to drive 45 mph, that’s okay. Life doesn’t have to be lived at 75 mph. There is a reason there are speed limits on roads. Actually, some country roads need slower speed limits. Just because it’s legal to drive 55 mph on a country road doesn’t mean it’s safe to drive that fast. Take your time, slow down and let Mario pass you so you can enjoy the rest of your ride.

Don’t ignore the efforts of others. When it’s obvious that someone is working and trying hard then give them some appreciation. Sometimes people work hard and still don’t do a great job. You don’t have to encourage them to continue in their failures. If people are trying, they have a chance of progressing and doing better. You can find a way to constructively encourage them in their efforts. Let the school teacher know he or she is appreciated. They have tough jobs. Let your local public servant know you are thankful for his or her community efforts. Public service is often a thankless job. Thank the people who take care of you at your local medical office, nursing home and so forth. Extend appreciation to those who help you along life’s journey.

Don’t let opportunities pass. Wish people happy birthday, anniversary or whatever the occasion may be. Grieve with those who are suffering loss. In some way we will all experience various life celebrations and difficult occasions. We need each other in the good times and the difficult times. Be a friend in the good times and the bad.

We rarely agree with each other all of the time or even most of the time. Approval of each other’s politics, life achievements or failures should not be a reason to withhold kindness or even friendship. Becoming adversarial only demonstrates that we are small and incapable of working with others to solve problems.

Finally, treat others the way you want to be treated. Love is kind and covers a multitude of sins.


About the author ~

Glen Mollett is the author of 13 books including Uncommom Sense, the Spiritual Chocolate series, Grandpa's Store, Minister's Guidebook insights from a fellow minister. His column is published weekly in over 600 publications in all 50 states.




TAGGED: Glenn Mollette life lessons and advice, practical strategies for navigating life, importance of kindness and appreciation, how to slow down and enjoy life, treating others with kindness and respect

Letter: Destruction of Gaza's life-sustaining systems must be confronted


Sentinel logo
A letter to the editor examines the United Nations Genocide Convention and arguments made by South Africa, Physicians for Human Rights Israel and architect Eyal Weizman concerning the destruction of homes, hospitals, water systems and other life-sustaining infrastructure in Gaza.


Dear Editor,

The United Nations Genocide Convention includes "deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part" among the acts that can constitute genocide.

South Africa made this specific prohibition central to its case against Israel before the International Court of Justice. While a final ruling on the merits may take years, the ICJ has already ordered Israel to “take all measures within its power” to prevent acts forbidden under the Convention.

Physicians for Human Rights Israel issued a July 2025 report titled Destruction of Conditions of Life: A Health Analysis of the Gaza Genocide. It concludes:

"Though Israel has cited military necessity...the scale, pattern, and nature of the operations, as well as accompanying statements, indicate a broader policy aimed at destroying Palestinian society in Gaza and making the enclave uninhabitable."

The report argues that the targeted destruction of hospitals, obstruction of medical aid, and the killing and detention of over 1,800 health care workers reveal a "deliberate and systematic dismantling of Gaza's health and life-sustaining systems."

Israeli architect Eyal Weizman makes a related argument in his 2026 book, Ungrounding: The Architecture of Genocide. Weizman documents how Israel's demolition of Gaza has made the territory unrecognizable and unlivable.

Weizman describes Gaza’s systematic destruction: “[M]ost of the Gaza Strip—cities, refugee camps, schools, universities, mosques, the health infrastructure, agriculture, wells and the soil itself—has been destroyed and made toxic by bombs, artillery, tank shells and sappers [combat engineers].”

He adds that “the most systematic destruction was caused by D9 bulldozers made by the US company Caterpillar.” An Israeli bulldozer operator in Gaza says that if Palestinians return to where their homes stood, “All they will find is sand.”

As Weizman puts it, "Ungrounding...aims to remove a society from its place and erase all traces to its previous existence."

When hospitals, homes, water systems, farmland, and even the soil are systematically destroyed, this is not collateral damage. It is the deliberate creation of conditions for the impossibility of life and must be confronted for what it is: genocide.


Terry Hansen
Grafton, WI

Terry Hansen is a retired educator from Grafton, WI, who writes frequently about climate change and on human rights. He lives in Grafton, WIsconsin.



TAGS: United Nations Genocide Convention Gaza conditions of life, International Court of Justice Israel Gaza genocide case, Physicians for Human Rights Israel Gaza report, Eyal Weizman Ungrounding Architecture of Genocide, destruction of life-sustaining infrastructure in Gaza

Let's take 60 seconds for a moment of silence


Sentinel logo
Americans must look to diplomacy over the destruction in dealing with Iran.


Dear Editor,

If a minute of silence is appropriate for Venezuelan earthquake victims, as has been done before World Cup soccer matches in the United States, it is also morally appropriate for civilians killed or wounded in Iran by U.S. and Israeli airstrikes. Human suffering should not be acknowledged selectively or only when it is politically convenient.

As Stanley Cohen observed in his book States of Denial, societies often look away from suffering that is uncomfortable to confront. A minute of silence is not an endorsement of any government or military. It is a simple act of respect for ordinary people who have lost their lives, homes, and loved ones.

If we can pause for victims of a natural disaster, we can surely pause for civilians harmed by war. Moral consistency requires us to mourn civilian suffering wherever it occurs.


Terry Hansen
Grafton, WI

Terry Hansen is a retired educator from Grafton, WI, who writes frequently about climate change and on human rights. He lives in Grafton, WIsconsin.



TAGS: Editorial Page, Sentinel Viewpoints, mourning the loss of life, respect for human life around the world

Viewpoint |
The trillion dollar presidency


oursentinel.com viewpoint
Donald Trump's presidency arrives every day in higher prices, higher interest costs, and a shrinking margin for America's future.


by Van Abbott
Guest Contributor


The bill for Donald Trump's presidency arrives every day in higher prices, higher interest costs, and a shrinking margin for America's future.

The trillion-dollar presidency is no longer a prediction. It is a governing model. Decisions on war, trade, borrowing, immigration, and industrial policy do not operate independently. They compound. One increases risk, another increases debt, a third weakens growth. Together they leave Americans paying more while receiving less.

Nowhere is that pattern more visible than in Iran.

In 2017, Trump inherited a functioning nuclear agreement that placed verifiable limits on Iran's nuclear program. He tore it up. The result was not a better deal, a safer Middle East, or a more secure America.

Instead, tensions escalated. The U.S. killed Iranian General Qasem Soleimani in 2020. Iran accelerated uranium enrichment. Proxy attacks multiplied. By early 2025, the escalation had produced sustained military exchanges between the United States and Iran, including strikes on Iranian soil and retaliatory attacks on American forces and regional partners.

The costs are already spreading through the global economy.

Iranian attacks on shipping, missile exchanges across the Gulf, and repeated threats to traffic through the Strait of Hormuz have injected instability into energy markets. Even when oil continues to flow, risk alone drives prices higher. Those increases ripple through transportation, manufacturing, food production, and consumer goods. Americans feel the consequences every time they fill a gas tank or buy groceries.

War has always carried hidden costs.

The Congressional Budget Office projects federal deficits approaching $2 trillion annually. Meanwhile, interest payments on the national debt have become one of the fastest-growing expenses in the federal budget. Washington now spends more servicing debt than it spends on many investments that strengthen long-term growth.

Every additional military commitment deepens the problem.

Borrow more, spend more, pay more.

The danger is not merely today's deficit. It is the compounding effect. Higher borrowing drives up interest costs. Higher interest costs crowd out productive investment. Slower growth produces even larger deficits. The cycle feeds itself.

America's financial standing is already showing signs of strain. In May 2025, Moody's became the last major credit-rating agency to strip the United States of its highest credit rating, citing rising debt levels and deteriorating fiscal management.

Economic growth depends on three ingredients: capital, talent, and confidence. This presidency is undermining all three. Investors face policy whiplash, skilled workers face growing barriers, and businesses face mounting uncertainty. When capital hesitates, talent leaves, and confidence fades, growth slows. The cost is measured not only in what Americans pay today but in what the nation fails to build tomorrow.

Trade policy magnifies the damage. The administration's tariff agenda has lurched from one challenge to another. Trading partners have retaliated. Businesses struggle to plan around policies that shift with each new announcement. Tariffs function as taxes on imported goods, raising costs throughout supply chains and ultimately passing many of those costs to consumers.

The result is paralysis. Companies delay investment. They delay hiring. They delay expansion.

Capital does not fear taxes nearly as much as it fears unpredictability.

The same instability appears in immigration policy. For generations, talented engineers, scientists, entrepreneurs, and students viewed the United States as the world's premier destination for opportunity. That is changing. The Institute of International Education reported declining enrollment intentions among international students, with more STEM candidates choosing Canada, Germany, and Australia. Visa restrictions, processing delays, and policy uncertainty are not merely slowing the pipeline. They are redirecting it.

America is not merely losing workers. It is losing inventors, founders, researchers, and future industries.

Energy policy tells a similar story. Clean-energy incentives have been weakened, projects delayed, and billions of dollars in planned investments thrown into doubt. Businesses require predictable rules before committing billions in capital. Constant policy reversals increase financing costs and discourage investment.

Overlaying all of this is a governing style built on transaction rather than principle. Tariffs appear negotiable. Enforcement appears selective. Pardons, contracts, and regulatory decisions often seem driven by personal relationships or political loyalty rather than consistent standards.

Markets notice. Investors notice. America's allies notice.

When policy becomes a bargaining chip rather than a commitment, confidence erodes. Investment retreats. Growth slows.

The bill for Donald Trump's presidency arrives every day in higher prices, higher interest costs, and a shrinking margin for America's future. Unless Americans reject a politics of permanent crisis, the costs will keep mounting, the opportunities will keep shrinking, and the bill will keep arriving.


About the author ~
Van Abbott is a long time resident of Alaska and California. He has held financial management positions in government and private organizations in California, Kansas, and Alaska. He is retired and writes Op-Eds as a hobby. He served in the Peace Corps in the late sixties. You can find more of his commentaries and comments on life in America on Substack.




TAGS: Trump's administration underminding economic growth, current U.S. policy has become a bargaining chip, top STEM candidates choosing other countries for work, the federal deficit is approaching $2 trillion, consumer prices are increasing daily


What do you think?
Whether you agree, disagree, or want to build on the ideas in this piece, we’d love to hear your voice. If you have an opinion you’d like to share — on this topic or any other — you can find our submission guidelines here: Sentinel submission guideline.

We welcome a wide range of viewpoints and would be glad to consider your perspective for publication on OurSentinel.com. Send your letter or commentary to editor@oursentinel.com and help keep the community conversation moving forward.


Viewpoint |
Summer is here; enjoy it while you can.


The nice long days of summer are now here. Don’t miss this glorious season. Do what you can do. Next summer? There is not guarantee you'll see it.


by Glenn Mollette
Guest Columnist


Glenn Mollette
Summer arrives slowly and disappears quickly. This all depends on where you live of course. If you are in Southern Florida, Texas, Arizona or California then warm and very hot days are almost always a part of life. For those of us a little further north, we know about long winters and the wet chilly months of April and early May. The anticipation of summer is exciting and very welcome.

Sadly, it only takes about two or three really hot days for folks to start growling and complaining about the hot weather. In these parts, we really only have two seasons, very cold weather and very hot weather. We will have a few days of Spring and sometimes two or three weeks of nice Fall weather, but that’s about it. After that, it’s time for heavy coats or shorts and tank tops.


Most Americans have spent a lot of time this year watching television or staring at their computers.

Summer is finally here and typically hot for the next three to four months. Let’s enjoy the season. Remember that big snowfall just a few months ago? You couldn’t get out of the house some days because it was dangerous. You can go outside now. On hot days just go early. Go walking, to the grocery store or whatever outside activity you choose.

Stay hydrated. Dehydration is a risk especially when mowing grass, playing sports, or gardening. Take time to cool down and hydrate. Every summer brings tragic news of football players dying during summer camp due to the heat. Coaches and schools must utilize all cautions to take care of their athletes. Parents must speak up about practices on extremely hot days. You have a voice. Speak up and let the coach know it’s seriously too hot for practice.

Reacquaint yourself with neighbors and friends. Take time to visit with those who have been inside most of the year. Take walks and slow down enough to engage in a conversation.

Most Americans have spent a lot of time this year watching television or staring at their computers. You can do this when November rolls back around. Utilize this time to be outside as much as possible. Wash your car, mow grass, plant flowers, play sports, swim, take long drives or visit state parks. Most anything outside will do.

The nice long days of summer are now here. When December comes back it will be dark by 5:30 p.m. and even 4:30 p.m. for most of the country. Currently it’s staying daylight until 8:00, 9:00 or even later. Soak in every minute of doing safe outside activities. When I was a child we would shoot basketball until 9:00 or 9:30 in the evening. We swam, camped out and played outside as much as possible. Those were great days and they were rarely boring. Today, many Americans have a hundred different television stations, movie channels and numerous social media accounts and still end up depressed.

It's summertime. Don’t miss this glorious season. Do what you can do, all you can do and do it when you can...which is now. You don’t have the guarantee of next summer. We have this summer. Let’s enjoy this season to the max.


About the author ~

Glen Mollett is the author of 13 books including Uncommom Sense, the Spiritual Chocolate series, Grandpa's Store, Minister's Guidebook insights from a fellow minister. His column is published weekly in over 600 publications in all 50 states.




TAGS: Columnist Glenn Mollette recommends enjoying your summer, hang out with friends and neighbors, avoid dehydration and the effects of hot weather

Viewpoint |
Republicans defend White House ballroom plan amid security claims


oursentinel.com viewpoint
A proposed White House ballroom expansion is being defended by Republicans as a security measure, but critics argue the justification masks a costly luxury project. The debate has sparked broader questions about priorities, spending, and political messaging.


by Van Abbott
Guest Contributor


Republicans now expect Americans to believe the greatest threat to presidential security is insufficient ballroom space at the White House.

That claim insults common sense from the first syllable to the last.

President Trump spends enormous amounts of time at golf resorts, private clubs, fundraisers, and sprawling luxury properties where security teams must defend open terrain, moving crowds, tree lines, beaches, roads, kitchens, docks, guests, staff, and endless unpredictable variables. Yet Republicans now insist the republic itself hinges on constructing a taxpayer-funded ceremonial palace in Washington.

Apparently the assassins lurk near the appetizer table.

Senators Lindsey Graham, Katie Britt, and Eric Schmitt push the argument with almost comic determination. They insist a massive White House ballroom will reduce risk because presidents can host events on secure grounds instead of traveling elsewhere. Trump echoes the sales pitch, portraying the ballroom as a fortress disguised as a banquet hall.

The logic collapses instantly.

If the White House is safest, why does Trump constantly leave it? If security is paramount, why normalize exposure on golf courses while demanding public money for chandeliers and gala space? If this project is indispensable, why did previous presidents survive without a taxpayer-funded palace wing?

Because this is not about security.

It is about spectacle.

Republicans understand the power of the word “security.” The moment they invoke it, scrutiny softens, questions fade, wallets open. Security justifies everything. Security excuses everything. Security sanctifies everything.

That is the lie.

The proposal itself ballooned from a supposedly donor-funded improvement into a sprawling luxury complex whose total cost could approach a billion dollars once infrastructure, renovations, and security modifications are fully counted. The price grows, the promises shrink, the excuses multiply.

First came the ballroom. Then came the “enhancements.” Then came the “necessary security infrastructure.” Washington always speaks softly before it reaches for the taxpayer’s wallet.

And Republicans expect Americans to swallow all of it while lecturing working families about fiscal discipline.

They preach austerity to workers, restraint to retirees, sacrifice to families. Then they sprint toward taxpayer-funded opulence the instant Trump wants a grander stage.

The hypocrisy does not merely drip. It floods.

A party that once howled about deficits now treats public money like confetti at a coronation. Citizens are told the nation cannot afford expanded healthcare, affordable housing, modern infrastructure, stronger retirement protections, or struggling public schools. Scarcity always governs ordinary Americans. Abundance always appears for the powerful.

Not for schools.

Not for hospitals.

Not for citizens.

For a ballroom.

The symbolism could not be clearer if Republicans installed a gold throne beneath the chandelier.

They are not constructing a security project. They are constructing a monument. A monument to excess. A monument to ego. A monument to the transformation of conservatism from a philosophy of restraint into a personality cult draped in velvet and gold.

The ballroom Itself becomes an almost perfect metaphor for modern Republican politics. Ornate on the surface, hollow underneath. Loud, glittering, theatrical, expensive. A political Versailles where image matters more than principle and loyalty matters more than truth.

They wrap luxury in patriotism. They wrap vanity in fear. They wrap indulgence in the flag.

And still the contradictions pile higher than the marble columns they want taxpayers to finance.

Assassins do not hide in White House banquet halls waiting beside the shrimp cocktail. Threats emerge during travel, motorcades, public appearances, outdoor recreation, and unscripted movement through unsecured environments. Every security professional understands this. Republicans understand it too. That is precisely why the ballroom argument feels so cynical. They are not selling protection. They are selling prestige wrapped in patriotic packaging, a palace marketed as policy, excess repainted as emergency.

And that is what makes the ballroom lie so revealing. Republicans now demand that Americans confuse luxury with leadership, extravagance with patriotism, and a presidential palace with national security.

The ballroom Is not protection. It is propaganda wrapped in gold leaf.


About the author ~
Van Abbott is a long time resident of Alaska and California. He has held financial management positions in government and private organizations in California, Kansas, and Alaska. He is retired and writes Op-Eds as a hobby. He served in the Peace Corps in the late sixties. You can find more of his commentaries and comments on life in America on Substack.




TAGS: White House ballroom controversy, Republican security argument criticism, Trump White House spending debate, political symbolism luxury government spending, Capitol political opinion analysis


What do you think?
Whether you agree, disagree, or want to build on the ideas in this piece, we’d love to hear your voice. If you have an opinion you’d like to share — on this topic or any other — you can find our submission guidelines here: Sentinel submission guideline.

We welcome a wide range of viewpoints and would be glad to consider your perspective for publication on OurSentinel.com. . Send your letter or commentary to editor@oursentinel.com and help keep the community conversation moving forward.



Editor's Choice


A pair of penalty kicks lift Michigan past Illinois in Big Ten match

Michigan made the most of its limited scoring opportunities Sunday, converting two penalty kicks to defeat Illinois 2-0 a...


More Sentinel Stories